FIKQX vs. FSPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX).
FIKQX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. FSPGX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FIKQX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIKQX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | -0.21% | 7.31% | 1.69% | 6.75% | -13.97% | -1.03% | 10.00% | 9.90% | 2.01% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.77% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -11.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKQX achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's -9.77% return.
FIKQX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.41%
- 10Y*
- —
FSPGX
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -9.77%
- 6M
- -9.26%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 21.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIKQX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKQX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIKQX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
FIKQX
FSPGX
FIKQX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIKQX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.84 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.36 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.17 | +0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 4.02 | +0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIKQX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.84 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.58 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.80 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKQX and FSPGX is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FIKQX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
FIKQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than FSPGX's 0.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | 3.66% | 3.97% | 4.08% | 3.65% | 2.05% | 1.44% | 4.90% | 2.83% | 1.07% | 0.00% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.38% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% |
Drawdowns
FIKQX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKQX drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, smaller than the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKQX and FSPGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKQX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.53% | -32.66% | +14.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -16.17% | +13.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | -32.66% | +14.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | -13.03% | +10.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -6.43% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 4.70% | -3.72% |
Volatility
FIKQX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) is 1.48%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that FIKQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIKQX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 6.71% | -5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | 12.37% | -9.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 22.58% | -18.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.98% | 21.52% | -15.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.51% | 21.66% | -16.15% |