PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIKQX vs. FNSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIKQX vs. FNSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIKQX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than FNSOX's 0.27% return.


FIKQX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.20%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*

FNSOX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.62%
1Y
3.46%
3Y*
4.44%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIKQX vs. FNSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIKQX
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z
0.24%7.31%1.69%6.75%-13.97%-1.03%10.00%9.90%2.01%
FNSOX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.27%6.01%3.90%4.90%-5.76%-1.25%4.28%4.95%1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKQX and FNSOX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.82

The correlation between FIKQX and FNSOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIKQX vs. FNSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIKQX
FIKQX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FIKQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSOX
FNSOX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FNSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIKQX vs. FNSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIKQXFNSOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.50

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.89

8.25

-3.36

FIKQX vs. FNSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the FNSOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKQX and FNSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIKQXFNSOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.78

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.55

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.83

-0.34

Drawdowns

FIKQX vs. FNSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKQX drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, which is greater than FNSOX's maximum drawdown of -8.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKQX and FNSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIKQXFNSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-8.92%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-1.47%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.05%

-1.51%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-8.77%

-9.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-0.70%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-1.73%

-3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.45%

+0.59%

Volatility

FIKQX vs. FNSOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX) at 0.65%. This indicates that FIKQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIKQXFNSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

0.65%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

1.51%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

2.07%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.00%

2.89%

+3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.48%

2.47%

+3.01%

FIKQX vs. FNSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKQX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FNSOX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIKQX vs. FNSOX - Dividend Comparison

FIKQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than FNSOX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIKQX
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z
4.01%3.97%4.08%3.65%2.05%1.44%4.90%2.83%1.07%0.00%
FNSOX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund
3.53%3.22%2.80%1.74%0.81%0.80%1.54%2.61%2.04%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIKQX and FNSOX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIKQX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to FNSOX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKQX dropped -18.53% vs FNSOX's -8.92%.

FNSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIKQX and FNSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer