PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIKNX vs. SSCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIKNX vs. SSCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX) and Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIKNX achieves a 25.69% return, which is significantly lower than SSCVX's 27.34% return.


FIKNX

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.91%
6M
19.82%
YTD
25.69%
1Y
39.03%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.14%

SSCVX

1D
1.14%
1M
0.52%
6M
19.06%
YTD
27.34%
1Y
39.97%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
9.95%
ALL TIME*
7.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIKNX vs. SSCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIKNX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z
25.69%8.18%8.00%17.97%-12.98%38.27%11.35%20.98%-13.08%
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
27.34%5.46%12.33%12.47%-15.35%31.25%9.61%18.76%-15.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKNX and SSCVX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.95

The correlation between FIKNX and SSCVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIKNX vs. SSCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIKNX
FIKNX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FIKNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SSCVX
SSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIKNX vs. SSCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX) and Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIKNXSSCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

4.67

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

14.87

-2.74

FIKNX vs. SSCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the SSCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKNX and SSCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIKNX vs. SSCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKNX drawdown since its inception was -44.09%, smaller than the maximum SSCVX drawdown of -65.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKNX and SSCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIKNXSSCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.09%

-65.34%

+21.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-7.88%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-29.22%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.87%

-29.22%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-0.38%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-11.79%

+4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.52%

+0.37%

Volatility

FIKNX vs. SSCVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) at 3.30%. This indicates that FIKNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIKNXSSCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

3.30%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

11.93%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.93%

17.30%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.87%

21.04%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.49%

23.35%

+1.14%

FIKNX vs. SSCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKNX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCVX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIKNX vs. SSCVX - Dividend Comparison

FIKNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, less than SSCVX's 8.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKNX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z
8.15%10.24%4.82%5.32%5.92%8.07%0.58%3.65%8.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
8.61%10.96%20.45%6.56%4.62%6.64%6.45%0.12%7.59%13.50%6.18%12.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIKNX and SSCVX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIKNX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to SSCVX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKNX dropped -44.09% vs SSCVX's -65.34%.

SSCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIKNX and SSCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer