FIKGX vs. SLMCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX).
FIKGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. SLMCX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 22, 1983.
Performance
FIKGX vs. SLMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIKGX vs. SLMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z | 7.52% | 45.43% | 35.88% | 75.75% | -34.81% | 58.07% | 44.21% | 64.45% | -11.11% |
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 5.76% | 37.32% | 26.67% | 44.27% | -31.14% | 38.97% | 44.45% | 54.15% | -11.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKGX achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than SLMCX's 5.76% return.
FIKGX
- 1D
- 7.13%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 14.55%
- 1Y
- 88.96%
- 3Y*
- 38.99%
- 5Y*
- 27.65%
- 10Y*
- —
SLMCX
- 1D
- 5.57%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 9.48%
- 1Y
- 65.25%
- 3Y*
- 31.63%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 22.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIKGX vs. SLMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKGX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than SLMCX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIKGX vs. SLMCX — Risk / Return Rank
FIKGX
SLMCX
FIKGX vs. SLMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIKGX | SLMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.26 | 2.17 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.86 | 2.75 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.39 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.22 | 4.46 | +0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.77 | 16.82 | +2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIKGX | SLMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 2.17 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.66 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.69 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKGX and SLMCX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIKGX vs. SLMCX - Dividend Comparison
FIKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, less than SLMCX's 8.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z | 6.20% | 6.67% | 0.00% | 3.14% | 3.08% | 4.19% | 4.54% | 1.08% | 19.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 8.94% | 9.45% | 14.27% | 5.16% | 9.42% | 11.75% | 10.40% | 11.44% | 12.33% | 11.15% | 8.19% | 10.79% |
Drawdowns
FIKGX vs. SLMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKGX drawdown since its inception was -45.98%, smaller than the maximum SLMCX drawdown of -68.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKGX and SLMCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKGX | SLMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.98% | -68.10% | +22.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.09% | -14.88% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.98% | -37.32% | -8.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | -7.05% | -1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.00% | -13.04% | +3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.51% | 3.95% | +0.56% |
Volatility
FIKGX vs. SLMCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) has a higher volatility of 12.80% compared to Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) at 11.14%. This indicates that FIKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIKGX | SLMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.80% | 11.14% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.66% | 21.67% | +3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.19% | 30.99% | +9.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.15% | 26.07% | +12.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.39% | 25.99% | +12.40% |