FIKGX vs. SMH
FIKGX (Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both funds - FIKGX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 5 years, FIKGX returned 34.11%/yr vs 33.46%/yr for SMH. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FIKGX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
FIKGX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIKGX having a 48.27% return and SMH slightly higher at 50.09%.
FIKGX
- 1D
- 7.40%
- 1M
- -8.92%
- 6M
- 32.71%
- YTD
- 48.27%
- 1Y
- 85.72%
- 3Y*
- 43.91%
- 5Y*
- 34.11%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 36.37%
SMH
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -8.74%
- 6M
- 33.97%
- YTD
- 50.09%
- 1Y
- 90.95%
- 3Y*
- 50.56%
- 5Y*
- 33.46%
- 10Y*
- 34.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $8.28B | $7.64B | $7.07B |
FIKGX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z | 48.27% | 45.43% | 35.88% | 75.75% | -34.81% | 58.07% | 44.21% | 64.45% | -11.11% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 50.09% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -10.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKGX and SMH is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.98 |
The correlation between FIKGX and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIKGX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
FIKGX
SMH
FIKGX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIKGX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.58 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | 14.64 | -1.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIKGX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKGX drawdown since its inception was -45.98%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKGX and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKGX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.98% | -84.96% | +38.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.88% | -24.62% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.67% | -35.74% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.98% | -45.30% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.46% | -19.19% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -40.89% | +31.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.35% | 6.01% | +0.34% |
Volatility
FIKGX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) has a higher volatility of 16.84% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 14.70%. This indicates that FIKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIKGX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.84% | 14.70% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.46% | 33.13% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.70% | 38.57% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.93% | 36.50% | +3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.08% | 33.32% | +5.76% |
FIKGX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKGX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIKGX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
FIKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than SMH's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z | 4.50% | 6.67% | 0.00% | 3.14% | 3.08% | 4.19% | 4.54% | 1.08% | 19.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FIKGX and SMH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIKGX has higher volatility (16.84%) compared to SMH (14.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKGX dropped -45.98% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIKGX and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer