FIKBX vs. FRBAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FIKBX (Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z) and FRBAX (John Hancock Regional Bank Fund) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FIKBX returned 9.47%/yr vs 4.86%/yr for FRBAX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIKBX charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for FRBAX.

Performance

FIKBX vs. FRBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) and John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIKBX achieves a -3.33% return, which is significantly lower than FRBAX's 5.34% return.

FIKBX

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: -3.33%
• 6M: -0.34%
• 1Y: 7.90%
• 3Y*: 21.02%
• 5Y*: 9.47%
• 10Y*: —

FRBAX

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: -2.17%
• YTD: 5.34%
• 6M: 6.34%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 22.42%
• 5Y*: 4.86%
• 10Y*: 9.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIKBX vs. FRBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z	-3.33%	15.36%	32.80%	14.47%	-8.58%	33.43%	0.18%	34.31%	-11.43%
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund	5.34%	11.07%	22.54%	-1.93%	-12.25%	40.51%	-10.11%	27.60%	-16.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKBX and FRBAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018	0.91

The correlation between FIKBX and FRBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIKBX vs. FRBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIKBX

FIKBX Risk / Return Rank: 6
FIKBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FIKBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FIKBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FIKBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FIKBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

FRBAX

FRBAX Risk / Return Rank: 16
FRBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FRBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
FRBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FRBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FRBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIKBX vs. FRBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) and John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIKBX	FRBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	1.03	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	1.54	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.20	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	1.55	-0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.62	4.10	-2.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIKBX vs. FRBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the FRBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKBX and FRBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIKBX	FRBAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46	1.03	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.18	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.40	+0.09

Drawdowns

FIKBX vs. FRBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKBX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, smaller than the maximum FRBAX drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKBX and FRBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIKBX	FRBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.95%	-67.55%	+21.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.96%	-14.22%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.38%	-25.26%	+5.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.82%	-46.15%	+21.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.26%	-6.26%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.10%	-12.28%	+4.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.52%	5.37%	-0.85%

Volatility

FIKBX vs. FRBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) is 3.59%, while John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that FIKBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIKBX	FRBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	5.55%	-1.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.87%	14.68%	-2.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.92%	21.50%	-5.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.77%	26.55%	-5.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.93%	29.31%	-3.38%

FIKBX vs. FRBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKBX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FRBAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIKBX vs. FRBAX - Dividend Comparison

FIKBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, less than FRBAX's 8.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z	7.36%	7.11%	5.04%	2.48%	6.20%	4.43%	2.78%	1.59%	4.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund	8.35%	8.82%	9.72%	2.65%	5.83%	5.26%	2.43%	1.75%	1.92%	1.76%	2.94%	4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIKBX and FRBAX in my portfolio?

FIKBX and FRBAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIKBX or FRBAX?

FRBAX has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to FIKBX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKBX dropped -45.95% vs FRBAX's -67.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.