PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIIG vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIIG vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Intermediate Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FIIG) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIIG achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than KNG's 2.20% return.


FIIG

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.08%
YTD
-0.56%
6M
-0.47%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIIG vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FIIG and KNG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2023

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIIG vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIIG
FIIG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FIIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FIIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIIG vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Intermediate Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FIIG) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIIGKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.13

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

0.87

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.30

2.25

+3.05

FIIG vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIIG and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIIGKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

0.73

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.49

+0.54

Drawdowns

FIIG vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIIG drawdown since its inception was -5.50%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIIG and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIIGKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-35.12%

+29.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-8.61%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-5.89%

+4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.39%

-4.13%

+2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

3.32%

-2.34%

Volatility

FIIG vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Intermediate Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FIIG) is 1.63%, while FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) has a volatility of 2.29%. This indicates that FIIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIIGKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

2.29%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

7.39%

-4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.61%

10.19%

-5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.91%

13.59%

-7.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.91%

17.18%

-11.27%

FIIG vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIIG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIIG vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

FIIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FIIG
First Trust Intermediate Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF
4.96%4.76%4.45%1.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIIG and KNG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNG has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to FIIG (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIIG dropped -5.50% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 1-year performance, KNG leads with 7.44% vs 5.17% for FIIG. On fees, FIIG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FIIG has been the lower-risk option at 1.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KNG has performed better with a 7.44% return vs 5.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIIG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 4.96% for FIIG.

FIIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FIIG and 0.75% for KNG.

FIIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIIG and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer