FIGB vs. VTG
FIGB (Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF) and VTG (Vanguard Total Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. FIGB is actively managed, while VTG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIGB charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTG.
Performance
FIGB vs. VTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGB achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than VTG's 0.01% return.
FIGB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- —
VTG
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIGB vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FIGB Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF | 0.14% | 3.20% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 0.01% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIGB and VTG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIGB vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank
FIGB
VTG
FIGB vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIGB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIGB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.91 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
FIGB vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGB drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, which is greater than VTG's maximum drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGB and VTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIGB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.08% | -2.89% | -15.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -1.78% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.92% | -0.74% | -6.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | — | — |
Volatility
FIGB vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIGB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 3.51% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.28% | 3.51% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 3.51% | +2.65% |
FIGB vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIGB has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIGB vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison
FIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than VTG's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGB Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.15% | 4.28% | 3.79% | 2.44% | 1.10% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 3.20% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIGB and VTG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FIGB.
FIGB has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 3.20% for VTG.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FIGB and 0.03% for VTG.
Find the right allocation for FIGB and VTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer