FIFGX vs. FILFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FIFGX (Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused) and FILFX (Strategic Advisers International Fund) are both mutual funds - FIFGX is a Commodities fund managed by Fidelity, while FILFX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FIFGX returned 74.86%/yr vs 8.84%/yr for FILFX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIFGX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for FILFX.

Performance

FIFGX vs. FILFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX) and Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIFGX achieves a 32.95% return, which is significantly higher than FILFX's 11.48% return.

FIFGX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -9.53%
• YTD: 32.95%
• 6M: 30.30%
• 1Y: 28.69%
• 3Y*: 141.87%
• 5Y*: 74.86%
• 10Y*: —

FILFX

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 2.64%
• YTD: 11.48%
• 6M: 11.97%
• 1Y: 25.32%
• 3Y*: 16.55%
• 5Y*: 8.84%
• 10Y*: 9.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIFGX vs. FILFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIFGX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused	32.95%	7.44%	6.34%	781.04%	9.30%	32.92%	1.48%	9.32%	-2.00%
FILFX Strategic Advisers International Fund	11.48%	30.56%	4.79%	18.21%	-17.44%	10.82%	14.90%	24.04%	0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FIFGX and FILFX is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2018	0.24

The correlation between FIFGX and FILFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FIFGX vs. FILFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIFGX

FIFGX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FIFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FIFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
FIFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FIFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FIFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

FILFX

FILFX Risk / Return Rank: 53
FILFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FILFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FILFX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FILFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FILFX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIFGX vs. FILFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX) and Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIFGX	FILFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.96	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.86	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.36	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	2.72	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.17	10.01	-2.83

FIFGX vs. FILFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the FILFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIFGX and FILFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIFGX vs. FILFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIFGX drawdown since its inception was -29.47%, smaller than the maximum FILFX drawdown of -60.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIFGX and FILFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIFGX	FILFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.47%	-60.75%	+31.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.91%	-11.19%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.91%	-13.60%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.47%	-33.88%	+4.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.91%	0.00%	-12.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.68%	-13.34%	+5.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	2.82%	+1.25%

Volatility

FIFGX vs. FILFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX) and Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) have volatilities of 5.18% and 5.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIFGX	FILFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.18%	5.10%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.68%	12.85%	+5.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.58%	15.57%	+6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	406.15%	16.48%	+389.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	331.81%	16.54%	+315.27%

FIFGX vs. FILFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIFGX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FILFX's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIFGX vs. FILFX - Dividend Comparison

FIFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than FILFX's 9.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIFGX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused	4.09%	5.44%	4.73%	1.54%	12.64%	35.77%	3.10%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FILFX Strategic Advisers International Fund	9.48%	7.33%	3.91%	2.45%	4.58%	8.87%	1.75%	3.26%	6.71%	3.13%	2.16%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIFGX and FILFX in my portfolio?

FIFGX and FILFX have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIFGX or FILFX?

FIFGX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to FILFX (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIFGX dropped -29.47% vs FILFX's -60.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FILFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.