FIDU vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FIDU (Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FIDU is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FIDU returned 14.15%/yr vs 17.03%/yr for XLG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIDU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

FIDU vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDU achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 5.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDU has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 14.15%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.03% annualized return.

FIDU

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 6M: 14.45%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: 21.68%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 14.15%

XLG

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -1.03%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 6M: 4.76%
• 1Y: 25.02%
• 3Y*: 23.53%
• 5Y*: 15.66%
• 10Y*: 17.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDU vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF	14.14%	18.61%	16.51%	22.62%	-8.36%	20.96%	13.72%	30.69%	-13.85%	22.22%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	5.19%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDU and XLG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.71

The correlation between FIDU and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FIDU vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIDU	XLG
Industrials	92.1%	1.9%
Technology	6.4%	43.9%
Consumer Cyclical	1.0%	11.3%
Basic Materials	0.2%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	9.6%
Utilities	0.1%	-
Communication Services	0.0%	17.1%
Energy	0.0%	2.7%
Healthcare	0.0%	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.8%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

FIDU vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDU

FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 48
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 53

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 55
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 60
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDU vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIDU	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.86	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.51	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.33	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	2.02	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.40	7.56	+0.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIDU vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDU and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIDU	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.86	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.84	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.91	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.62	+0.04

Drawdowns

FIDU vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDU drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDU and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIDU	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.31%	-52.39%	+10.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.23%	-12.41%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.52%	-20.70%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.87%	-28.02%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.31%	-30.46%	-11.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	-3.62%	+1.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-7.64%	+2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	3.32%	-0.36%

Volatility

FIDU vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.01%. This indicates that FIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIDU	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	4.01%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.60%	10.19%	+3.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.59%	13.57%	+3.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.29%	18.72%	-0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.32%	18.87%	+1.45%

FIDU vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FIDU vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than XLG's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF	0.96%	1.02%	1.42%	1.42%	1.48%	1.12%	1.28%	1.73%	1.99%	1.60%	1.63%	1.98%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.61%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIDU and XLG in my portfolio?

FIDU and XLG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIDU or XLG?

FIDU has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to XLG (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDU dropped -42.31% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, FIDU or XLG?

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.03% vs 14.15% for FIDU. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIDU or XLG?

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.03% return vs 14.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIDU or XLG?

FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIDU or XLG?

FIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.61% for XLG.

What is the main difference between FIDU and XLG?

FIDU is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FIDU and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.