FIDU vs. POW
FIDU (Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FIDU is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. FIDU is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIDU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
FIDU vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIDU achieves a 16.82% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.
FIDU
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- YTD
- 16.82%
- 1Y
- 22.49%
- 3Y*
- 20.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
POW
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- 6M
- 31.71%
- YTD
- 38.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIDU vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 16.82% | -1.00% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 38.93% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIDU and POW is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIDU vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
FIDU
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FIDU vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIDU | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIDU vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIDU drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDU and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIDU | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.31% | -18.37% | -23.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.77% | -18.37% | +14.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.78% | -4.33% | -0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | — | — |
Volatility
FIDU vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIDU | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.81% | 32.94% | -15.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 32.94% | -14.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 32.94% | -12.60% |
FIDU vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIDU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIDU vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.28% | 1.73% | 1.99% | 1.60% | 1.63% | 1.98% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIDU and POW have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
FIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
FIDU is categorized as Industrials Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FIDU and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for FIDU and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer