FIDSX vs. SPMO
FIDSX (Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both funds - FIDSX is a Financials Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Over the past 10 years, FIDSX returned 13.49%/yr vs 21.24%/yr for SPMO. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIDSX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
FIDSX vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIDSX achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 32.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDSX has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 13.49%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.24% annualized return.
FIDSX
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 9.03%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
SPMO
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 32.66%
- 6M
- 33.70%
- 1Y
- 50.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.16%
- 5Y*
- 24.34%
- 10Y*
- 21.24%
FIDSX vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio | 1.93% | 9.33% | 32.82% | 14.53% | -8.19% | 33.13% | 1.22% | 34.25% | -16.13% | 20.92% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 32.66% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIDSX and SPMO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.50 |
The correlation between FIDSX and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FIDSX vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FIDSX
SPMO
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FIDSX
SPMO
Technology
FIDSX
SPMO
Basic Materials
FIDSX
-
SPMO
Communication Services
FIDSX
-
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
FIDSX
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
FIDSX
-
SPMO
Energy
FIDSX
-
SPMO
Healthcare
FIDSX
-
SPMO
Industrials
FIDSX
-
SPMO
Real Estate
FIDSX
-
SPMO
Utilities
FIDSX
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIDSX vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
FIDSX
SPMO
FIDSX vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIDSX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.46 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 3.96 | -3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.97 | 14.96 | -13.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIDSX vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIDSX drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDSX and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIDSX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.26% | -30.95% | -43.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.60% | -12.70% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -20.13% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.49% | -22.74% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.48% | -30.95% | -14.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.19% | 0.00% | -5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.94% | -4.60% | -9.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 3.35% | +3.47% |
Volatility
FIDSX vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) is 4.53%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that FIDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIDSX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 10.78% | -6.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.57% | 17.04% | -3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.21% | 19.78% | -2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 19.71% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 20.52% | +3.17% |
FIDSX vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIDSX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIDSX vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
FIDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than SPMO's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio | 1.42% | 1.70% | 6.03% | 3.01% | 11.32% | 4.12% | 5.86% | 5.57% | 12.89% | 4.22% | 1.00% | 0.70% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.64% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIDSX and SPMO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to FIDSX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDSX dropped -74.26% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIDSX and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer