PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDSX vs. FAFDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDSX vs. FAFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDSX achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than FAFDX's -2.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIDSX having a 12.65% annualized return and FAFDX not far ahead at 13.28%.


FIDSX

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
-2.20%
6M
-4.00%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
12.65%

FAFDX

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
-2.07%
6M
1.39%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
23.17%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
13.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDSX vs. FAFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDSX
Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio
-2.20%9.33%32.82%14.53%-8.19%33.13%1.22%34.25%-16.13%20.92%
FAFDX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A
-2.07%14.91%39.01%14.03%-8.93%32.90%-0.25%33.77%-16.09%20.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDSX and FAFDX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 1996

1.00

The correlation between FIDSX and FAFDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDSX vs. FAFDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDSX
FIDSX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FIDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FAFDX
FAFDX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FAFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FAFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDSX vs. FAFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIDSXFAFDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.11

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

0.70

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.53

2.00

-1.47

FIDSX vs. FAFDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the FAFDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDSX and FAFDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIDSXFAFDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

0.57

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.50

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.56

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.30

+0.18

Drawdowns

FIDSX vs. FAFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDSX drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, roughly equal to the maximum FAFDX drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDSX and FAFDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDSXFAFDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.26%

-75.69%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.60%

-13.04%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-19.41%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-25.14%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.48%

-45.99%

+0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.03%

-5.02%

-4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.95%

-17.65%

+3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.69%

4.55%

+2.14%

Volatility

FIDSX vs. FAFDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) have volatilities of 3.43% and 3.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDSXFAFDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

3.38%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

11.78%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.89%

15.86%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.86%

21.09%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

23.85%

-0.18%

FIDSX vs. FAFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDSX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FAFDX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDSX vs. FAFDX - Dividend Comparison

FIDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than FAFDX's 7.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAFDX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A
7.08%6.93%9.59%2.29%5.93%4.21%2.47%1.21%4.00%0.06%0.21%0.53%
FIDSX
Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio
1.48%1.70%6.03%3.01%11.32%4.12%5.86%5.57%12.89%4.22%1.00%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FIDSX and FAFDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIDSX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to FAFDX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDSX dropped -74.26% vs FAFDX's -75.69%.

FAFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDSX and FAFDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer