PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDSX vs. ARKQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDSX vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDSX achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than ARKQ's 17.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDSX has underperformed ARKQ with an annualized return of 13.49%, while ARKQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.08% annualized return.


FIDSX

1D
1.33%
1M
5.53%
YTD
1.93%
6M
-3.39%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
9.99%
10Y*
13.49%

ARKQ

1D
4.08%
1M
1.98%
YTD
17.47%
6M
19.36%
1Y
64.14%
3Y*
34.41%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
22.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDSX vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDSX
Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio
1.93%9.33%32.82%14.53%-8.19%33.13%1.22%34.25%-16.13%20.92%
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
17.47%48.81%33.88%40.70%-46.75%1.74%107.20%25.94%-7.89%52.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDSX and ARKQ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.55

The correlation between FIDSX and ARKQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FIDSX vs. ARKQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIDSX
ARKQ

Financial Services

98.7%

-

Technology

1.3%
34.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

13.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.7%

Healthcare

-

1.1%

Industrials

-

39.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

1.0%

Financial Services

FIDSX
98.7%
ARKQ

-

Technology

FIDSX
1.3%
ARKQ
34.2%

Basic Materials

FIDSX

-

ARKQ

-

Communication Services

FIDSX

-

ARKQ
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FIDSX

-

ARKQ
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

FIDSX

-

ARKQ

-

Energy

FIDSX

-

ARKQ
1.7%

Healthcare

FIDSX

-

ARKQ
1.1%

Industrials

FIDSX

-

ARKQ
39.0%

Real Estate

FIDSX

-

ARKQ

-

Utilities

FIDSX

-

ARKQ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDSX vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDSX
FIDSX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FIDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDSX vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIDSXARKQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.30

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

3.13

-2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.97

9.22

-8.24

FIDSX vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDSX and ARKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIDSX vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDSX drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, which is greater than ARKQ's maximum drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDSX and ARKQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDSXARKQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.26%

-59.89%

-14.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.60%

-20.58%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-30.76%

+11.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-55.71%

+31.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.48%

-59.89%

+14.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.19%

-6.35%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.94%

-17.21%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

6.98%

-0.16%

Volatility

FIDSX vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) is 4.53%, while ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a volatility of 13.37%. This indicates that FIDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDSXARKQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

13.37%

-8.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

26.41%

-12.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

33.76%

-16.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.90%

32.56%

-11.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.69%

30.01%

-6.32%

FIDSX vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDSX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDSX vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

FIDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than ARKQ's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.23%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
FIDSX
Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio
1.42%1.70%6.03%3.01%11.32%4.12%5.86%5.57%12.89%4.22%1.00%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDSX and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKQ has higher volatility (13.37%) compared to FIDSX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDSX dropped -74.26% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.

ARKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDSX and ARKQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer