PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDFX vs. FASOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDFX vs. FASOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIDFX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIDFX having a 23.12% return and FASOX slightly higher at 24.15%.


FIDFX

1D
0.41%
1M
5.80%
YTD
23.12%
6M
21.86%
1Y
40.26%
3Y*
23.47%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*

FASOX

1D
0.07%
1M
4.51%
YTD
24.15%
6M
22.76%
1Y
40.94%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
9.68%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDFX vs. FASOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDFX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z
23.12%13.16%14.66%22.69%-10.52%34.11%1.15%23.72%-18.82%13.56%
FASOX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I
24.15%8.28%-2.00%20.51%-7.38%33.31%8.21%34.49%-16.90%13.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDFX and FASOX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017

0.97

The correlation between FIDFX and FASOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDFX vs. FASOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDFX
FIDFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FIDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FASOX
FASOX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FASOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FASOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDFX vs. FASOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIDFX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIDFXFASOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

4.29

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.46

15.79

-0.33

FIDFX vs. FASOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the FASOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDFX and FASOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIDFX vs. FASOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDFX drawdown since its inception was -44.98%, smaller than the maximum FASOX drawdown of -69.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDFX and FASOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDFXFASOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.98%

-69.86%

+24.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-9.79%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.70%

-34.34%

+10.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.70%

-34.34%

+10.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.41%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-9.69%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.65%

+0.03%

Volatility

FIDFX vs. FASOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIDFX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) have volatilities of 5.20% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDFXFASOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

4.96%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

12.30%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.72%

17.35%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.25%

20.68%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.63%

22.04%

-0.41%

FIDFX vs. FASOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FASOX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDFX vs. FASOX - Dividend Comparison

FIDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, less than FASOX's 7.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASOX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I
7.27%9.03%0.00%2.74%2.34%7.97%0.91%5.21%15.65%7.00%20.89%1.24%
FIDFX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z
6.42%8.32%10.60%1.30%13.40%1.43%2.11%2.03%15.16%9.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FIDFX and FASOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIDFX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to FASOX (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDFX dropped -44.98% vs FASOX's -69.86%.

FIDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDFX and FASOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer