PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDAX vs. VTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDAX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDAX achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly lower than VTMFX's 6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDAX has outperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.


FIDAX

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
-2.42%
6M
1.94%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
9.79%

VTMFX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.06%
YTD
6.03%
6M
6.16%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
8.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDAX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDAX
John Hancock Financial Industries Fund
-2.42%12.05%30.09%5.01%-14.17%28.80%1.58%31.21%-15.30%11.00%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
6.03%11.28%12.17%15.55%-12.69%13.10%13.31%18.01%-1.40%12.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDAX and VTMFX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 1996

0.79

The correlation between FIDAX and VTMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDAX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDAX
FIDAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FIDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMFX
VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDAX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIDAXVTMFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.35

2.83

-2.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.58

4.05

-3.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.55

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

3.22

-2.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.14

15.40

-14.26

FIDAX vs. VTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the VTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDAX and VTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIDAXVTMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

2.83

-2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.86

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.96

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.85

-0.53

Drawdowns

FIDAX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDAX drawdown since its inception was -70.42%, which is greater than VTMFX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDAX and VTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDAXVTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.42%

-28.49%

-41.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.82%

-5.38%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-10.61%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.89%

-17.40%

-13.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.09%

-21.87%

-20.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.74%

0.00%

-5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.07%

-3.55%

-10.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

1.12%

+3.78%

Volatility

FIDAX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 1.70%. This indicates that FIDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDAXVTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

1.70%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

4.75%

+7.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

6.13%

+9.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.68%

8.52%

+12.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.98%

9.12%

+12.86%

FIDAX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDAX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison

FIDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.38%, more than VTMFX's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDAX
John Hancock Financial Industries Fund
49.38%48.19%10.24%1.91%11.22%23.08%5.41%7.56%7.72%6.10%6.01%0.93%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
2.10%2.14%2.08%1.94%1.85%1.38%1.72%2.05%2.22%2.00%2.13%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDAX and VTMFX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIDAX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to VTMFX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDAX dropped -70.42% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.

VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDAX and VTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer