PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FID vs. TIER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FID vs. TIER

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and TIER (T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. FID is passively managed, while TIER is actively managed. Over the past year, FID returned 18.41% vs 28.20% for TIER. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FID charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TIER.

Performance

FID vs. TIER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FID achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than TIER's 13.74% return.

FID

1D
0.86%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
6.45%
6M
5.99%
1Y
18.41%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
—

TIER

1D
0.88%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
13.74%
6M
13.51%
1Y
28.20%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FID vs. TIER - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF		6.45%11.23%
TIER
T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF		13.74%12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FID and TIER is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.76

FID vs. TIER - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FID
TIER

Financial Services

20.4%
23.6%

Utilities

16.3%
2.5%

Industrials

13.6%
13.7%

Communication Services

11.3%
5.2%

Real Estate

9.1%
1.1%

Energy

7.9%
5.1%

Technology

6.3%
23.7%

Basic Materials

4.4%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.6%

Healthcare

3.4%
5.9%

Financial Services

FID
20.4%
TIER
23.6%

Utilities

FID
16.3%
TIER
2.5%

Industrials

FID
13.6%
TIER
13.7%

Communication Services

FID
11.3%
TIER
5.2%

Real Estate

FID
9.1%
TIER
1.1%

Energy

FID
7.9%
TIER
5.1%

Technology

FID
6.3%
TIER
23.7%

Basic Materials

FID
4.4%
TIER
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FID
3.8%
TIER
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

FID
3.7%
TIER
4.6%

Healthcare

FID
3.4%
TIER
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF

T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF

Often compared with FID:
FID vs. IGROFID vs. EFAVFID vs. KNGFID vs. VIGFID vs. VIGIFID vs. FDFIXFID vs. BRK-B
Often compared with TIER:
TIER vs. TGRWTIER vs. TOUSTIER vs. TSPATIER vs. CILTIER vs. TCHPTIER vs. TGRTTIER vs. BKIE

Return for Risk

FID vs. TIER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FID
FID Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
TIER

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FID vs. TIER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FIDTIERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.80

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.53

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.07

—

—

FID vs. TIER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FID vs. TIER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FID drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than TIER's maximum drawdown of -12.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FID and TIER.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FIDTIERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.79%

-12.07%

-27.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-12.07%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.97%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.13%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

-2.38%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-1.79%

-6.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

—

—

Volatility

FID vs. TIER - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FIDTIERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

16.45%

-6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

16.45%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.92%

16.45%

+2.47%

FID vs. TIER - Expense Ratio Comparison

FID has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TIER's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

FID vs. TIER - Dividend Comparison

FID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, more than TIER's 0.65% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF		5.97%4.30%4.31%4.19%4.22%3.76%3.91%3.70%1.74%
TIER
T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF		0.65%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FID and TIER have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, TIER leads with 28.20% vs 18.41% for FID. On fees, TIER is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TIER has performed better with a 28.20% return vs 18.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TIER is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.

FID has the higher dividend yield at 5.97%, compared with 0.65% for TIER.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FID and 0.38% for TIER.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FID and TIER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer