PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FID vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FID vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FID achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 14.02% return.


FID

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.56%
YTD
8.56%
6M
10.95%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*

IDOG

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.24%
YTD
14.02%
6M
16.64%
1Y
35.52%
3Y*
21.96%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FID vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
8.56%32.07%5.42%9.92%-9.69%12.90%-7.56%20.82%-8.00%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
14.02%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FID and IDOG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018

0.78

The correlation between FID and IDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

FID vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FID
IDOG

Financial Services

20.8%
11.0%

Utilities

17.4%
10.0%

Industrials

13.5%
11.7%

Communication Services

11.5%
9.9%

Real Estate

9.4%

-

Energy

8.0%
10.7%

Basic Materials

4.3%
10.0%

Technology

4.1%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
9.4%

Healthcare

3.5%
9.3%

Financial Services

FID
20.8%
IDOG
11.0%

Utilities

FID
17.4%
IDOG
10.0%

Industrials

FID
13.5%
IDOG
11.7%

Communication Services

FID
11.5%
IDOG
9.9%

Real Estate

FID
9.4%
IDOG

-

Energy

FID
8.0%
IDOG
10.7%

Basic Materials

FID
4.3%
IDOG
10.0%

Technology

FID
4.1%
IDOG
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FID
4.0%
IDOG
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

FID
3.7%
IDOG
9.4%

Healthcare

FID
3.5%
IDOG
9.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FID vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FID
FID Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FID vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIDIDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.46

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

5.51

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

19.31

-10.17

FID vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FID Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FID and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIDIDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.68

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.86

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.51

-0.12

Drawdowns

FID vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FID drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than IDOG's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FID and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.79%

-37.32%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-6.47%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.97%

-13.92%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.13%

-25.31%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.47%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-7.93%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

1.84%

+0.71%

Volatility

FID vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) is 3.00%, while ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that FID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

4.13%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

10.09%

-1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

13.33%

-3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

15.61%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

17.45%

+1.51%

FID vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FID has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FID vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

FID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than IDOG's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
4.02%4.30%4.31%4.19%4.22%3.76%3.91%3.70%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.42%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


FID and IDOG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDOG has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FID dropped -39.79% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, IDOG leads with 13.36% vs 7.74% for FID. On fees, IDOG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDOG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.

FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 3.42% for IDOG.

FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FID and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FID and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer