FID vs. IDEV
FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index while IDEV tracks the MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FID returned 7.74%/yr vs 8.48%/yr for IDEV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FID charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IDEV.
Performance
FID vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FID having a 8.56% return and IDEV slightly higher at 8.92%.
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
IDEV
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 11.57%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- —
FID vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | -7.56% | 20.82% | -8.00% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 8.92% | 32.56% | 4.54% | 17.36% | -14.99% | 13.00% | 8.32% | 23.12% | -13.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FID and IDEV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018 | 0.78 |
The correlation between FID and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
FID vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FID
IDEV
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
FID
IDEV
Utilities
FID
IDEV
Industrials
FID
IDEV
Communication Services
FID
IDEV
Real Estate
FID
IDEV
Energy
FID
IDEV
Basic Materials
FID
IDEV
Technology
FID
IDEV
Consumer Cyclical
FID
IDEV
Consumer Defensive
FID
IDEV
Healthcare
FID
IDEV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FID vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank
FID
IDEV
FID vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FID | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.29 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.08 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 8.16 | +0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FID | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.61 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.52 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.55 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
FID vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FID drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than IDEV's maximum drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FID and IDEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FID | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -34.77% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -11.20% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.97% | -13.41% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.13% | -29.15% | +0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -0.98% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -6.57% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.85% | -0.30% |
Volatility
FID vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) is 3.00%, while iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that FID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FID | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 4.60% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 12.10% | -3.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 14.51% | -4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 16.26% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 17.27% | +1.69% |
FID vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FID has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FID vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison
FID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than IDEV's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% | 0.00% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 3.13% | 3.40% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.00% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FID and IDEV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDEV has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FID dropped -39.79% vs IDEV's -34.77%.
On 5-year performance, IDEV leads with 8.48% vs 7.74% for FID. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 8.48% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 3.13% for IDEV.
FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index, while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FID and 0.05% for IDEV.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FID and IDEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer