FID vs. DFIV
FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. FID is passively managed, while DFIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FID returned 17.43%/yr vs 23.90%/yr for DFIV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FID charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.
Performance
FID vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FID achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 11.54% return.
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
DFIV
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 15.41%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 23.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FID vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | -1.01% |
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 11.54% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FID and DFIV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between FID and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
FID vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FID
DFIV
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
FID
DFIV
Utilities
FID
DFIV
Industrials
FID
DFIV
Communication Services
FID
DFIV
Real Estate
FID
DFIV
Energy
FID
DFIV
Basic Materials
FID
DFIV
Technology
FID
DFIV
Consumer Cyclical
FID
DFIV
Consumer Defensive
FID
DFIV
Healthcare
FID
DFIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FID vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank
FID
DFIV
FID vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FID | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.46 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 3.63 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 14.02 | -4.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FID | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.56 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.94 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
FID vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FID drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FID and DFIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FID | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -25.42% | -14.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -9.66% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.97% | -14.72% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.02% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -4.48% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.49% | +0.06% |
Volatility
FID vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) is 3.00%, while Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that FID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FID | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 3.89% | -0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 10.99% | -2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 13.69% | -3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 16.63% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 16.63% | +2.33% |
FID vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FID has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
FID vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison
FID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than DFIV's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.55% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FID and DFIV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFIV has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FID dropped -39.79% vs DFIV's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.90% vs 17.43% for FID. On fees, DFIV is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.90% return vs 17.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFIV is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.55% for DFIV.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FID and 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FID and DFIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer