FID vs. CWI
FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and CWI (SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index while CWI tracks the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FID returned 7.74%/yr vs 8.77%/yr for CWI. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FID charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CWI.
Performance
FID vs. CWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FID achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than CWI's 13.91% return.
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
CWI
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 32.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
FID vs. CWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | -7.56% | 20.82% | -8.00% |
CWI SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 13.91% | 32.75% | 6.27% | 15.74% | -15.39% | 8.81% | 9.83% | 21.92% | -12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FID and CWI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FID and CWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
FID vs. CWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FID
CWI
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
FID
CWI
Utilities
FID
CWI
Industrials
FID
CWI
Communication Services
FID
CWI
Real Estate
FID
CWI
Energy
FID
CWI
Basic Materials
FID
CWI
Technology
FID
CWI
Consumer Cyclical
FID
CWI
Consumer Defensive
FID
CWI
Healthcare
FID
CWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FID vs. CWI — Risk / Return Rank
FID
CWI
FID vs. CWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FID | CWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.38 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.81 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 10.92 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FID | CWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.10 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.54 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.25 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
FID vs. CWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FID drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, smaller than the maximum CWI drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FID and CWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FID | CWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -60.77% | +20.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -11.47% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.97% | -13.85% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.13% | -29.45% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.22% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -12.86% | +4.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.95% | -0.40% |
Volatility
FID vs. CWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) is 3.00%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that FID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FID | CWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 5.81% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 13.10% | -4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 15.35% | -5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 16.25% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 17.13% | +1.83% |
FID vs. CWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FID has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CWI's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FID vs. CWI - Dividend Comparison
FID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than CWI's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 2.70% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 2.80% | 3.17% | 2.65% | 2.07% | 3.05% | 2.81% | 2.29% | 2.45% | 2.62% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FID and CWI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWI has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FID dropped -39.79% vs CWI's -60.77%.
On 5-year performance, CWI leads with 8.77% vs 7.74% for FID. On fees, CWI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CWI has performed better with a 8.77% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CWI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.70% for CWI.
FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index, while CWI tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FID and 0.30% for CWI.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FID and CWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer