FID vs. CIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index while CIL tracks the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FID returned 7.74%/yr vs 7.45%/yr for CIL. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FID charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

FID vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FID achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.

FID

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 2.56%
• YTD: 8.56%
• 6M: 10.95%
• 1Y: 23.28%
• 3Y*: 17.43%
• 5Y*: 7.74%
• 10Y*: —

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 7.94%
• 1Y: 17.37%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FID vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF	8.56%	32.07%	5.42%	9.92%	-9.69%	12.90%	-7.56%	20.82%	-8.00%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	-16.00%	11.07%	7.21%	19.13%	-13.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FID and CIL is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018	0.66

The correlation between FID and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.79 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FID vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FID	CIL
Financial Services	20.8%	24.8%
Utilities	17.4%	6.6%
Industrials	13.5%	18.4%
Communication Services	11.5%	5.8%
Real Estate	9.4%	2.2%
Energy	8.0%	4.6%
Basic Materials	4.3%	6.6%
Technology	4.1%	6.4%
Consumer Cyclical	4.0%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	8.8%
Healthcare	3.5%	7.7%

Return for Risk

FID vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FID

FID Risk / Return Rank: 62
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 53

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 76
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FID vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FID	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.24	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.22	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.49	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	3.95	-1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.14	16.75	-7.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FID vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FID Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FID and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FID	CIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	2.24	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.46	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.43	-0.04

Drawdowns

FID vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FID drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than CIL's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FID and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FID	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.79%	-36.27%	-3.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-4.60%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.97%	-11.96%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.13%	-29.89%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-0.58%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.47%	-6.56%	-1.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	1.07%	+1.48%

Volatility

FID vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that FID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FID	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.00%	0.00%	+3.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.12%	4.23%	+3.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.16%	8.19%	+1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.04%	16.49%	+0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.96%	17.17%	+1.79%

FID vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FID has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FID vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

FID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than CIL's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.67%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF	4.02%	4.30%	4.31%	4.19%	4.22%	3.76%	3.91%	3.70%	1.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FID and CIL in my portfolio?

FID and CIL have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FID or CIL?

FID has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FID dropped -39.79% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, FID or CIL?

On 5-year performance, FID leads with 7.74% vs 7.45% for CIL. On fees, CIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FID or CIL?

Over the 5-year period, FID has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FID or CIL?

CIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FID or CIL?

FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.

What is the main difference between FID and CIL?

FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FID and 0.45% for CIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.