PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICVX vs. ANNPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FICVX vs. ANNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICVX achieves a 14.07% return, which is significantly lower than ANNPX's 15.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FICVX has underperformed ANNPX with an annualized return of 11.93%, while ANNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return.


FICVX

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.63%
6M
8.16%
YTD
14.07%
1Y
25.29%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
11.93%
ALL TIME*
13.49%

ANNPX

1D
1.33%
1M
-1.62%
6M
9.02%
YTD
15.07%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
13.45%
ALL TIME*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FICVX vs. ANNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
14.07%18.28%8.11%11.39%-15.38%9.93%42.46%28.58%-1.31%9.03%
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
15.07%22.50%14.13%8.39%-18.65%4.96%55.99%26.45%2.76%15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FICVX and ANNPX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2009

0.94

The correlation between FICVX and ANNPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICVX vs. ANNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FICVX
FICVX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

ANNPX
ANNPX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ANNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ANNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FICVX vs. ANNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FICVXANNPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

3.37

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

12.52

-4.73

FICVX vs. ANNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the ANNPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICVX and ANNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FICVX vs. ANNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICVX drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, smaller than the maximum ANNPX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICVX and ANNPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICVXANNPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.06%

-55.61%

+30.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-9.06%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-13.67%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.20%

-26.85%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.06%

-27.36%

+2.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.04%

-5.76%

-3.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-17.38%

+11.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.43%

+0.60%

Volatility

FICVX vs. ANNPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) at 5.21%. This indicates that FICVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICVXANNPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

5.21%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.95%

12.90%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.00%

15.79%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

13.20%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.86%

13.74%

+0.12%

FICVX vs. ANNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICVX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than ANNPX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FICVX vs. ANNPX - Dividend Comparison

FICVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.16%, less than ANNPX's 9.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
9.58%11.32%2.31%2.56%1.55%20.74%6.94%5.12%18.79%23.47%2.88%10.63%
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
9.16%11.38%2.02%2.12%3.73%20.65%10.73%3.28%9.85%4.09%4.90%10.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FICVX and ANNPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FICVX has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to ANNPX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICVX dropped -25.06% vs ANNPX's -55.61%.

ANNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICVX and ANNPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer