FICS vs. POW

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FICS (First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FICS is a Global Equities fund tracking the The International Developed Capital Strength Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. FICS is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FICS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

FICS vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICS achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 41.57% return.

FICS

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 2.56%
• 6M: 5.76%
• YTD: 6.13%
• 1Y: 8.99%
• 3Y*: 10.77%
• 5Y*: 5.61%
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -7.03%
• 6M: 34.18%
• YTD: 41.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICS vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FICS First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF	6.13%	2.02%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	41.57%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FICS and POW is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

FICS vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICS

FICS Risk / Return Rank: 23
FICS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FICS Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
FICS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FICS Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FICS Martin Ratio Rank: 24

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICS vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FICS	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.49	—	—

Drawdowns

FICS vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICS drawdown since its inception was -29.16%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICS and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FICS	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.16%	-18.37%	-10.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-16.82%	+15.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-4.40%	-2.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FICS	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.21%	32.91%	-19.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.23%	32.91%	-15.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	32.91%	-16.07%

FICS vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FICS vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

FICS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FICS First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF	1.83%	1.85%	2.01%	1.02%	1.89%	1.26%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FICS and POW in my portfolio?

FICS and POW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FICS or POW?

On fees, FICS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FICS or POW?

FICS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FICS or POW?

FICS has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between FICS and POW?

FICS is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FICS and 0.75% for POW.