FICO vs. TPL
FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) and TPL (Texas Pacific Land Corporation) are both stocks. FICO operates in Software - Application (Technology), while TPL operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, FICO returned 23.80%/yr vs 36.05%/yr for TPL. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FICO vs. TPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FICO achieves a -35.43% return, which is significantly lower than TPL's 33.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FICO has underperformed TPL with an annualized return of 23.80%, while TPL has yielded a comparatively higher 36.05% annualized return.
FICO
- 1D
- 4.26%
- 1M
- -15.15%
- 6M
- -21.29%
- YTD
- -35.43%
- 1Y
- -18.73%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.98%
- 10Y*
- 23.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.01%
TPL
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -5.19%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- YTD
- 33.31%
- 1Y
- 20.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.53%
- 5Y*
- 19.79%
- 10Y*
- 36.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $560.10M | $412.51M | $397.70M | |
| $120.04M | $115.71M | $154.42M |
FICO vs. TPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | -35.43% | -15.08% | 71.04% | 94.46% | 38.03% | -15.14% | 36.39% | 100.36% | 22.06% | 28.52% |
TPL Texas Pacific Land Corporation | 33.31% | -21.61% | 115.31% | -32.40% | 91.29% | 73.25% | -4.69% | 44.58% | 21.96% | 51.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between FICO and TPL is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 1992 | 0.13 |
The correlation between FICO and TPL shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.19 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FICO:
$23.57B
TPL:
$26.34B
FICO:
$34.47
TPL:
$7.84
FICO:
31.66
TPL:
48.69
FICO:
1.68
TPL:
2.58
FICO:
10.78
TPL:
29.37
FICO:
$2.39B
TPL:
$897.54M
FICO:
$2.04B
TPL:
$900.39M
FICO:
$1.25B
TPL:
$744.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FICO vs. TPL — Risk / Return Rank
FICO
TPL
FICO vs. TPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FICO | TPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.12 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 0.59 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 1.27 | -1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FICO vs. TPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FICO drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, which is greater than TPL's maximum drawdown of -73.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICO and TPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FICO | TPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.26% | -73.05% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.93% | -34.23% | -16.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.28% | -52.22% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.28% | -52.50% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.28% | -65.46% | +4.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.18% | -33.13% | -21.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.16% | -27.28% | +9.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.43% | 16.02% | +11.41% |
Volatility
FICO vs. TPL - Volatility Comparison
Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a higher volatility of 23.27% compared to Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) at 10.79%. This indicates that FICO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FICO | TPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.27% | 10.79% | +12.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.17% | 37.38% | +6.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.63% | 47.84% | +5.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.96% | 46.33% | -4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.61% | 47.30% | -8.69% |
Dividends
FICO vs. TPL - Dividend Comparison
FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.08% |
TPL Texas Pacific Land Corporation | 0.59% | 0.74% | 1.37% | 0.83% | 1.37% | 0.88% | 2.20% | 0.22% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 0.10% | 0.22% |
Financials
FICO vs. TPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fair Isaac Corporation and Texas Pacific Land Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FICO vs. TPL - Profitability Comparison
FICO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 587.17M and revenue of 674.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.1%.
TPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 246.06M and revenue of 246.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
FICO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 362.63M and revenue of 674.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.8%.
TPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported an operating income of 191.82M and revenue of 246.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 78.0%.
FICO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 237.17M and revenue of 674.19M, resulting in a net margin of 35.2%.
TPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a net income of 153.93M and revenue of 246.06M, resulting in a net margin of 62.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FICO and TPL have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FICO has higher volatility (23.27%) compared to TPL (10.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICO dropped -79.26% vs TPL's -73.05%.
TPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FICO and TPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer