PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICDX vs. FLCA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FICDX vs. FLCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Canada Fund (FICDX) and Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICDX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than FLCA's 8.49% return.


FICDX

1D
0.84%
1M
2.43%
YTD
7.97%
6M
11.79%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
10.43%

FLCA

1D
-1.52%
1M
1.39%
YTD
8.49%
6M
12.58%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICDX vs. FLCA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FICDX
Fidelity Canada Fund
7.97%25.86%9.15%14.66%-6.14%26.86%4.43%25.82%-14.32%-0.40%
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
8.49%34.62%13.02%14.71%-11.93%28.67%6.31%28.42%-15.55%2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FICDX and FLCA is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.90

The correlation between FICDX and FLCA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICDX vs. FLCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICDX
FICDX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FICDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FICDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCA
FLCA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICDX vs. FLCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canada Fund (FICDX) and Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FICDXFLCADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.49

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.19

14.25

-6.06

FICDX vs. FLCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the FLCA Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICDX and FLCA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FICDXFLCADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.14

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.70

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Drawdowns

FICDX vs. FLCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICDX drawdown since its inception was -58.09%, which is greater than FLCA's maximum drawdown of -41.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICDX and FLCA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICDXFLCADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.09%

-41.51%

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.60%

-8.55%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.06%

-12.58%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.01%

-24.23%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-1.52%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.52%

-5.91%

-4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.09%

+0.20%

Volatility

FICDX vs. FLCA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Canada Fund (FICDX) is 2.76%, while Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that FICDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICDXFLCADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

3.50%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

11.15%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

13.94%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

16.71%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.42%

19.04%

-1.62%

FICDX vs. FLCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICDX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCA's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FICDX vs. FLCA - Dividend Comparison

FICDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than FLCA's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FICDX
Fidelity Canada Fund
5.28%5.70%7.44%3.36%4.11%5.16%2.56%4.41%7.33%0.89%1.63%0.15%
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
1.71%1.85%2.50%2.49%2.20%2.02%2.49%2.29%3.03%0.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FICDX and FLCA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLCA has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to FICDX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICDX dropped -58.09% vs FLCA's -41.51%.

FLCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICDX and FLCA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer