PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHTKX vs. LTSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHTKX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund Class K6 (FHTKX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHTKX achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than LTSTX's 4.47% return.


FHTKX

1D
2.02%
1M
-1.12%
6M
7.02%
YTD
10.64%
1Y
22.03%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.57%

LTSTX

1D
0.79%
1M
-0.17%
6M
2.78%
YTD
4.47%
1Y
10.06%
3Y*
10.75%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
7.73%
ALL TIME*
6.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHTKX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund Class K6
10.64%22.35%16.63%20.25%-18.08%16.80%18.62%25.70%-8.72%9.80%
LTSTX
Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund
4.47%12.16%11.91%13.30%-15.23%10.91%13.70%20.50%-6.41%7.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FHTKX and LTSTX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.95

The correlation between FHTKX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHTKX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHTKX
FHTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FHTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FHTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

LTSTX
LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHTKX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund Class K6 (FHTKX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHTKXLTSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

1.80

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.87

7.79

+2.08

FHTKX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHTKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHTKX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHTKX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHTKX drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHTKX and LTSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHTKXLTSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-48.17%

+17.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.69%

-5.24%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-8.12%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.05%

-21.01%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-0.78%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-6.11%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.21%

+0.89%

Volatility

FHTKX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund Class K6 (FHTKX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) at 1.95%. This indicates that FHTKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHTKXLTSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

1.95%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

5.99%

+5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

7.19%

+5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

9.23%

+5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

9.76%

+5.80%

FHTKX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHTKX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHTKX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

FHTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than LTSTX's 11.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund Class K6
6.63%5.27%5.65%2.00%12.68%12.37%5.93%7.00%8.48%3.12%0.00%0.00%
LTSTX
Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund
11.67%12.19%9.74%4.26%8.00%7.66%5.25%6.91%6.39%4.75%3.65%8.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FHTKX and LTSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHTKX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to LTSTX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHTKX dropped -30.95% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

FHTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHTKX and LTSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer