PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHSNX vs. VBAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHSNX vs. VBAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) and Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHSNX achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than VBAIX's 5.84% return.


FHSNX

1D
0.80%
1M
-0.24%
6M
3.22%
YTD
5.21%
1Y
11.02%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.38%

VBAIX

1D
1.01%
1M
-0.81%
6M
4.74%
YTD
5.84%
1Y
13.39%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
9.67%
ALL TIME*
7.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHSNX vs. VBAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FHSNX
Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund
5.21%12.26%7.18%9.32%-15.16%5.16%20.21%
VBAIX
Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Institutional Shares
5.84%13.60%17.78%17.55%-16.87%14.20%26.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FHSNX and VBAIX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2020

0.87

The correlation between FHSNX and VBAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHSNX vs. VBAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHSNX
FHSNX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FHSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FHSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VBAIX
VBAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VBAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VBAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHSNX vs. VBAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) and Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHSNXVBAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.13

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

9.09

+0.86

FHSNX vs. VBAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHSNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the VBAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHSNX and VBAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHSNX vs. VBAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHSNX drawdown since its inception was -19.53%, smaller than the maximum VBAIX drawdown of -35.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHSNX and VBAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHSNXVBAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.53%

-35.82%

+16.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.41%

-5.84%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.73%

-11.57%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.53%

-21.52%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-1.46%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-4.40%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

1.36%

-0.29%

Volatility

FHSNX vs. VBAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) is 1.83%, while Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBAIX) has a volatility of 2.31%. This indicates that FHSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHSNXVBAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

2.31%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.19%

6.84%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.05%

8.56%

-2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.10%

11.19%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.33%

11.25%

-3.92%

FHSNX vs. VBAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHSNX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VBAIX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FHSNX vs. VBAIX - Dividend Comparison

FHSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than VBAIX's 5.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHSNX
Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund
2.72%2.93%3.06%3.01%3.71%2.57%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VBAIX
Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Institutional Shares
5.39%6.01%8.01%4.36%2.84%3.20%2.65%2.29%2.33%1.96%2.10%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FHSNX and VBAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBAIX has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to FHSNX (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHSNX dropped -19.53% vs VBAIX's -35.82%.

FHSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHSNX and VBAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer