PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHRFX vs. FFANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHRFX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K6 (FHRFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FHRFX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FFANX

1D
0.40%
1M
0.54%
6M
5.81%
YTD
7.24%
1Y
14.37%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
6.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHRFX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FHRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K6
4.62%13.52%7.26%12.21%-15.50%8.21%13.45%5.10%
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
7.24%13.16%7.40%11.52%-13.62%8.03%13.10%5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FHRFX and FFANX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.97

The correlation between FHRFX and FFANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHRFX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHRFX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FFANX
FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHRFX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K6 (FHRFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHRFXFFANXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.45

FHRFX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHRFX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHRFXFFANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

Volatility

FHRFX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHRFXFFANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.71%

FHRFX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHRFX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHRFX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

FHRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than FFANX's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
3.03%3.97%2.81%2.49%5.75%2.35%2.36%3.67%4.56%2.56%1.43%3.18%
FHRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K6
3.73%2.79%3.26%2.80%4.93%5.33%3.81%2.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FHRFX and FFANX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHRFX and FFANX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer