PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHRFX vs. LTIUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHRFX vs. LTIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K6 (FHRFX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FHRFX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

LTIUX

1D
1.15%
1M
-0.07%
6M
3.84%
YTD
5.87%
1Y
12.88%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
9.26%
ALL TIME*
7.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHRFX vs. LTIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FHRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K6
4.62%13.52%7.26%12.21%-15.50%8.21%13.45%5.10%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
5.87%14.26%14.13%16.51%-17.48%14.07%15.70%6.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FHRFX and LTIUX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.92

The correlation between FHRFX and LTIUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHRFX vs. LTIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHRFX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


LTIUX
LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHRFX vs. LTIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K6 (FHRFX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHRFXLTIUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.66

FHRFX vs. LTIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHRFX vs. LTIUX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHRFXLTIUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

Volatility

FHRFX vs. LTIUX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHRFXLTIUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.43%

FHRFX vs. LTIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHRFX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than LTIUX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHRFX vs. LTIUX - Dividend Comparison

FHRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than LTIUX's 8.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K6
3.50%2.79%3.26%2.80%4.93%5.33%3.81%2.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
8.53%9.03%9.46%4.17%7.50%7.06%5.35%7.28%7.75%5.46%4.28%5.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHRFX and LTIUX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHRFX and LTIUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer