FHPDX vs. LTSTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHPDX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6) and LTSTX (Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FHPDX returned 3.79%/yr vs 5.67%/yr for LTSTX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHPDX charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTSTX.

Performance

FHPDX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6 (FHPDX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FHPDX having a 5.44% return and LTSTX slightly lower at 5.20%.

FHPDX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 5.75%
• 1Y: 12.79%
• 3Y*: 9.08%
• 5Y*: 3.79%
• 10Y*: —

LTSTX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 2.49%
• YTD: 5.20%
• 6M: 5.33%
• 1Y: 13.74%
• 3Y*: 12.33%
• 5Y*: 5.67%
• 10Y*: 8.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHPDX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHPDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6	5.44%	11.22%	5.32%	9.88%	-13.04%	5.31%	10.90%	14.58%	-4.50%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	5.20%	12.16%	11.91%	13.30%	-15.23%	10.91%	13.70%	20.50%	-9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FHPDX and LTSTX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.90

The correlation between FHPDX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHPDX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHPDX

FHPDX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FHPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FHPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FHPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FHPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FHPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

LTSTX

LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 53
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHPDX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6 (FHPDX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHPDX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	2.11	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	3.05	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.41	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	2.67	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.24	12.06	+2.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHPDX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHPDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHPDX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHPDX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	2.11	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.62	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.48	+0.33

Drawdowns

FHPDX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHPDX drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHPDX and LTSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHPDX	LTSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.48%	-48.17%	+29.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.96%	-5.24%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.86%	-8.12%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.48%	-21.01%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.78%	-6.16%	+2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	1.16%	-0.25%

Volatility

FHPDX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6 (FHPDX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) have volatilities of 2.01% and 2.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHPDX	LTSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.01%	2.02%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.16%	5.39%	-1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.01%	6.64%	-1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.46%	9.18%	-2.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.72%	9.83%	-3.11%

FHPDX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHPDX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FHPDX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

FHPDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than LTSTX's 11.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHPDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6	2.99%	3.16%	2.99%	2.79%	5.75%	6.10%	3.54%	2.44%	2.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	11.59%	12.19%	9.74%	4.26%	8.00%	7.66%	5.25%	6.91%	6.39%	4.75%	3.65%	8.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHPDX and LTSTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FHPDX and LTSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHPDX or LTSTX?

LTSTX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to FHPDX (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHPDX dropped -18.48% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHPDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.