PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHOFX vs. VTHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHOFX vs. VTHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FHOFX) and Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHOFX achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly lower than VTHR's 9.46% return.


FHOFX

1D
1.65%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
3.02%
6M
3.50%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
22.85%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*

VTHR

1D
0.61%
1M
0.45%
YTD
9.46%
6M
9.47%
1Y
24.30%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
14.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHOFX vs. VTHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHOFX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
3.02%18.55%33.37%42.77%-29.13%27.68%38.39%36.38%-15.37%
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
9.46%16.99%23.57%25.92%-19.20%25.49%20.93%30.82%-14.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FHOFX and VTHR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.92

The correlation between FHOFX and VTHR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHOFX vs. VTHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHOFX
FHOFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FHOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FHOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VTHR
VTHR Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTHR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTHR Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHOFX vs. VTHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FHOFX) and Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHOFXVTHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.74

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.05

12.28

-8.22

FHOFX vs. VTHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHOFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the VTHR Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHOFX and VTHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHOFX vs. VTHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHOFX drawdown since its inception was -32.62%, smaller than the maximum VTHR drawdown of -34.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHOFX and VTHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHOFXVTHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.62%

-34.61%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.13%

-8.91%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.31%

-19.36%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.62%

-25.06%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.51%

-2.02%

-3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-4.04%

-3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

1.99%

+2.86%

Volatility

FHOFX vs. VTHR - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FHOFX) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) at 4.33%. This indicates that FHOFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHOFXVTHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

4.33%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.43%

9.87%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.99%

12.70%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.61%

17.36%

+4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.15%

17.86%

+5.29%

FHOFX vs. VTHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHOFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VTHR's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FHOFX vs. VTHR - Dividend Comparison

FHOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than VTHR's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHOFX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.94%0.97%0.55%0.83%1.41%3.02%2.91%1.30%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
1.02%1.08%1.19%1.47%1.52%1.16%1.37%1.65%1.89%1.63%1.82%1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FHOFX and VTHR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHOFX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to VTHR (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHOFX dropped -32.62% vs VTHR's -34.61%.

VTHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHOFX and VTHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer