FHODX vs. FFFCX
FHODX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class K6) and FFFCX (Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FHODX returned 4.42%/yr vs 3.70%/yr for FFFCX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FHODX charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FFFCX.
Performance
FHODX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHODX achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly higher than FFFCX's 5.33% return.
FHODX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 6.69%
- 1Y
- 14.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- —
FFFCX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 12.68%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
FHODX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHODX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class K6 | 6.22% | 12.99% | 6.23% | 11.41% | -14.73% | 7.05% | 12.31% | 16.71% | -6.51% |
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund | 5.33% | 11.39% | 5.26% | 9.82% | -13.21% | 5.64% | 11.09% | 14.34% | -4.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHODX and FFFCX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018 | 0.98 |
The correlation between FHODX and FFFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHODX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank
FHODX
FFFCX
FHODX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class K6 (FHODX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHODX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.53 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.20 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.23 | 13.95 | +0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHODX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.59 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.68 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
FHODX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHODX drawdown since its inception was -20.62%, smaller than the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHODX and FFFCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHODX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.62% | -36.88% | +16.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.67% | -4.00% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.84% | -5.83% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.62% | -18.35% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -4.57% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 0.92% | +0.14% |
Volatility
FHODX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class K6 (FHODX) has a higher volatility of 2.24% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) at 2.02%. This indicates that FHODX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHODX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.24% | 2.02% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.89% | 4.15% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.88% | 4.95% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.62% | 6.38% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.20% | 6.30% | +1.90% |
FHODX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHODX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHODX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison
FHODX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than FFFCX's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund | 4.66% | 4.97% | 2.99% | 2.72% | 7.23% | 9.33% | 6.01% | 5.78% | 6.98% | 4.82% | 3.22% | 3.68% |
FHODX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class K6 | 2.84% | 3.06% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 6.00% | 6.96% | 4.16% | 2.80% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, FHODX and FFFCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FHODX has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to FFFCX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHODX dropped -20.62% vs FFFCX's -36.88%.
FFFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHODX and FFFCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer