PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHLFX vs. DCINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHLFX vs. DCINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLFX achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly lower than DCINX's 21.30% return.


FHLFX

1D
-0.90%
1M
-0.12%
6M
6.23%
YTD
9.40%
1Y
20.56%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*

DCINX

1D
-1.78%
1M
-2.06%
6M
15.24%
YTD
21.30%
1Y
41.86%
3Y*
25.87%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
12.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLFX vs. DCINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
9.40%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
21.30%46.37%7.65%15.98%-14.67%9.70%19.86%18.14%-12.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLFX and DCINX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.90

The correlation between FHLFX and DCINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHLFX vs. DCINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

DCINX
DCINX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLFX vs. DCINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHLFXDCINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

3.56

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

13.58

-6.90

FHLFX vs. DCINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the DCINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLFX and DCINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHLFX vs. DCINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLFX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, smaller than the maximum DCINX drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLFX and DCINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHLFXDCINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.58%

-61.79%

+28.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-11.91%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.62%

-13.74%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.36%

-31.18%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-4.58%

+2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.04%

-12.80%

+6.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.12%

-0.08%

Volatility

FHLFX vs. DCINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) is 5.03%, while Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that FHLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHLFXDCINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

7.19%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

15.68%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.52%

17.77%

-2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

15.79%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

16.49%

+1.15%

FHLFX vs. DCINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLFX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than DCINX's 2.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHLFX vs. DCINX - Dividend Comparison

FHLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than DCINX's 9.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
9.02%10.95%13.87%3.45%3.53%15.49%1.36%1.54%6.92%3.92%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.16%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHLFX and DCINX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCINX has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to FHLFX (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLFX dropped -33.58% vs DCINX's -61.79%.

DCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHLFX and DCINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer