FHLC vs. PBPH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - FHLC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHLC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.

Performance

FHLC vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLC achieves a -3.90% return, which is significantly lower than PBPH's -1.13% return.

FHLC

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 1.50%
• YTD: -3.90%
• 6M: -4.11%
• 1Y: 14.43%
• 3Y*: 6.14%
• 5Y*: 4.50%
• 10Y*: 9.14%

PBPH

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: -1.13%
• 6M: -0.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLC vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	-3.90%	-2.27%
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF	-1.13%	0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLC and PBPH is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025	0.87

Return for Risk

FHLC vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLC

FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 27
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLC vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHLC	PBPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.52	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHLC	PBPH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	-0.04	+0.65

Drawdowns

FHLC vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLC drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLC and PBPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHLC	PBPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.76%	-11.10%	-17.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.96%	-8.69%	+1.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.19%	-4.23%	-0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FHLC	PBPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.11%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.33%	16.78%	-2.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.97%	16.78%	-1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.81%	16.78%	+0.03%

FHLC vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FHLC vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison

FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	1.43%	1.40%	1.51%	1.40%	1.30%	1.16%	1.45%	1.18%	1.38%	1.38%	1.40%	2.07%
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF	0.09%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHLC and PBPH in my portfolio?

FHLC and PBPH have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FHLC or PBPH?

On fees, FHLC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FHLC or PBPH?

FHLC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for PBPH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FHLC or PBPH?

FHLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.

What is the main difference between FHLC and PBPH?

FHLC tracks MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FHLC and 0.13% for PBPH.