FHLC vs. FUTY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) and FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FHLC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index, while FUTY is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FHLC returned 9.40%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for FUTY. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.

Performance

FHLC vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLC achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than FUTY's 3.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FHLC having a 9.40% annualized return and FUTY not far behind at 9.10%.

FHLC

• 1D: 2.97%
• 1M: 4.17%
• YTD: -1.05%
• 6M: -0.68%
• 1Y: 17.55%
• 3Y*: 7.06%
• 5Y*: 5.11%
• 10Y*: 9.40%

FUTY

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -4.86%
• YTD: 3.78%
• 6M: 1.95%
• 1Y: 12.10%
• 3Y*: 13.73%
• 5Y*: 9.26%
• 10Y*: 9.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLC vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	-1.05%	15.42%	2.48%	2.58%	-5.55%	20.39%	18.13%	21.94%	4.71%	23.34%
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF	3.78%	16.40%	23.20%	-7.46%	1.12%	17.53%	-0.80%	24.89%	4.36%	12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLC and FUTY is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013	0.38

The correlation between FHLC and FUTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FHLC vs. FUTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FHLC	FUTY
Healthcare	99.6%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Technology	0.0%	-
Industrials	0.0%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	99.2%

Return for Risk

FHLC vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLC

FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 34
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 30

FUTY

FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 25
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLC vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHLC	FUTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	0.85	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	1.23	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.15	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	1.36	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.27	3.05	+1.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHLC vs. FUTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the FUTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLC and FUTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHLC	FUTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	0.85	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.54	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.48	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.55	+0.07

Drawdowns

FHLC vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLC drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, smaller than the maximum FUTY drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLC and FUTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHLC	FUTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.76%	-36.44%	+7.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.38%	-8.93%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.87%	-17.35%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.73%	-25.11%	+7.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.76%	-36.44%	+7.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.20%	-6.72%	+2.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.19%	-6.03%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	3.98%	+0.14%

Volatility

FHLC vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) is 4.95%, while Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that FHLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHLC	FUTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	5.52%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.52%	11.38%	-0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.62%	14.34%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.02%	17.08%	-2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	19.05%	-2.21%

FHLC vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FHLC and FUTY have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FHLC vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison

FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than FUTY's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	1.38%	1.40%	1.51%	1.40%	1.30%	1.16%	1.45%	1.18%	1.38%	1.38%	1.40%	2.07%
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF	2.60%	2.67%	2.96%	3.31%	2.72%	2.70%	3.07%	2.82%	3.11%	3.03%	3.35%	4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHLC and FUTY in my portfolio?

FHLC and FUTY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHLC or FUTY?

FUTY has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to FHLC (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLC dropped -28.76% vs FUTY's -36.44%.

Which ETF is better, FHLC or FUTY?

On 10-year performance, FHLC leads with 9.40% vs 9.10% for FUTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, FHLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FHLC or FUTY?

Over the 10-year period, FHLC has performed better with a 9.40% return vs 9.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FHLC or FUTY?

FHLC and FUTY have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FHLC or FUTY?

FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.38% for FHLC.

What is the main difference between FHLC and FUTY?

FHLC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while FUTY is Utilities Equities. FHLC tracks MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index, while FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.