FHKIX vs. FERCX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FHKIX (Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I) and FERCX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C) are both mutual funds - FHKIX is a China Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FERCX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FHKIX returned 13.65%/yr vs 13.26%/yr for FERCX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FHKIX charges 0.93%/yr vs 1.96%/yr for FERCX.

Performance

FHKIX vs. FERCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKIX achieves a 28.07% return, which is significantly higher than FERCX's 25.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FHKIX having a 13.65% annualized return and FERCX not far behind at 13.26%.

FHKIX

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -3.14%
• 6M: 15.48%
• YTD: 28.07%
• 1Y: 55.43%
• 3Y*: 28.30%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: 13.65%
• ALL TIME*: 8.84%

FERCX

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: -4.85%
• 6M: 16.02%
• YTD: 25.44%
• 1Y: 44.16%
• 3Y*: 26.97%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: 13.26%
• ALL TIME*: 9.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FHKIX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FHKIX vs. FERCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHKIX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I	28.07%	42.60%	23.15%	-0.28%	-23.85%	-13.71%	47.80%	35.11%	-17.43%	51.93%
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	25.44%	35.65%	19.76%	12.64%	-31.29%	-15.75%	71.24%	29.64%	-15.72%	45.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FHKIX and FERCX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2008	0.92

The correlation between FHKIX and FERCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHKIX vs. FERCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHKIX

FHKIX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FHKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FHKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FHKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FHKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FHKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FERCX

FERCX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHKIX vs. FERCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHKIX	FERCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.66	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	2.13	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.30	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.36	2.69	+1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.32	8.65	+3.67

FHKIX vs. FERCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the FERCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKIX and FERCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHKIX vs. FERCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKIX drawdown since its inception was -58.42%, roughly equal to the maximum FERCX drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKIX and FERCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHKIX	FERCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.42%	-61.15%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.26%	-15.66%	+3.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.02%	-17.64%	-4.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.18%	-51.15%	+2.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.42%	-58.44%	+0.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.46%	-10.98%	+2.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.56%	-21.12%	+2.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	4.87%	-0.54%

Volatility

FHKIX vs. FERCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) is 8.93%, while Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) has a volatility of 10.11%. This indicates that FHKIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FERCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHKIX	FERCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.93%	10.11%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.84%	23.13%	-2.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.80%	25.43%	-0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.69%	23.77%	+0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.66%	21.52%	+1.14%

FHKIX vs. FERCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than FERCX's 1.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHKIX vs. FERCX - Dividend Comparison

FHKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.89%	7.03%	5.13%	6.53%	0.03%	0.56%	0.92%
FHKIX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I	1.44%	1.84%	1.44%	1.89%	1.04%	10.81%	4.90%	0.65%	0.79%	0.44%	1.40%	15.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHKIX and FERCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FHKIX and FERCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHKIX or FERCX?

FERCX has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to FHKIX (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHKIX dropped -58.42% vs FERCX's -61.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.