PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHKDX vs. FFFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHKDX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6 (FHKDX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKDX achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly higher than FFFCX's 5.33% return.


FHKDX

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.07%
YTD
9.27%
6M
9.07%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*

FFFCX

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.18%
YTD
5.33%
6M
5.26%
1Y
11.82%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
6.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHKDX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHKDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6
9.27%17.16%11.51%15.59%-17.34%11.29%15.45%22.82%-9.37%
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
5.33%11.39%5.26%9.82%-13.21%5.64%11.09%14.34%-4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FHKDX and FFFCX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.94

The correlation between FHKDX and FFFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHKDX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHKDX
FHKDX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FHKDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHKDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHKDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FHKDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHKDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFCX
FFFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FFFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHKDX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6 (FHKDX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHKDXFFFCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

3.05

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

12.99

+0.28

FHKDX vs. FFFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the FFFCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKDX and FFFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHKDX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKDX drawdown since its inception was -24.65%, smaller than the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKDX and FFFCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHKDXFFFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.65%

-36.88%

+12.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

-4.00%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.12%

-5.83%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.54%

-18.35%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.19%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-4.57%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

0.94%

+0.66%

Volatility

FHKDX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6 (FHKDX) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) at 2.37%. This indicates that FHKDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHKDXFFFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

2.37%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

4.63%

+3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

5.38%

+4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.95%

6.45%

+4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.34%

6.32%

+6.02%

FHKDX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKDX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHKDX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison

FHKDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than FFFCX's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
4.66%4.97%2.99%2.72%7.23%9.33%6.01%5.78%6.98%4.82%3.22%3.68%
FHKDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6
3.71%3.10%4.50%2.36%5.54%7.10%4.65%3.34%2.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FHKDX and FFFCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHKDX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to FFFCX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHKDX dropped -24.65% vs FFFCX's -36.88%.

FHKDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHKDX and FFFCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer