PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHKCX vs. CHILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHKCX vs. CHILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKCX achieves a 39.90% return, which is significantly higher than CHILX's 13.72% return.


FHKCX

1D
2.61%
1M
7.20%
YTD
39.90%
6M
43.06%
1Y
86.69%
3Y*
34.11%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
15.41%

CHILX

1D
1.52%
1M
3.38%
YTD
13.72%
6M
18.41%
1Y
41.88%
3Y*
13.49%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHKCX vs. CHILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FHKCX
Fidelity China Region Fund
39.90%42.56%23.15%-0.29%-23.87%-13.69%47.85%40.85%
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
13.72%26.30%15.44%-12.29%-28.54%3.54%48.69%48.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FHKCX and CHILX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2019

0.69

The correlation between FHKCX and CHILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHKCX vs. CHILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHKCX
FHKCX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FHKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FHKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CHILX
CHILX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CHILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CHILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHKCX vs. CHILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHKCXCHILXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.14

2.61

+1.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.85

3.47

+1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.45

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.15

5.04

+3.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

25.25

16.20

+9.05

FHKCX vs. CHILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKCX Sharpe Ratio is 4.14, which is higher than the CHILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKCX and CHILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHKCXCHILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14

2.61

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.04

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.57

-0.13

Drawdowns

FHKCX vs. CHILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKCX drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than CHILX's maximum drawdown of -47.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKCX and CHILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHKCXCHILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.96%

-47.73%

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.80%

-8.54%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.02%

-22.59%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.42%

-43.88%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.86%

+4.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.26%

-20.47%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.65%

+0.83%

Volatility

FHKCX vs. CHILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) at 6.06%. This indicates that FHKCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHKCXCHILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

6.06%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.63%

11.88%

+4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.26%

16.51%

+4.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.24%

20.28%

+3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.33%

21.84%

+0.49%

FHKCX vs. CHILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKCX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than CHILX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHKCX vs. CHILX - Dividend Comparison

FHKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than CHILX's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
2.58%2.94%2.11%2.02%0.92%1.19%3.64%12.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FHKCX
Fidelity China Region Fund
1.25%1.75%1.39%1.92%1.05%10.77%4.85%0.66%0.83%0.39%1.35%15.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHKCX and CHILX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHKCX has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to CHILX (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHKCX dropped -61.96% vs CHILX's -47.73%.

FHKCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.14 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHKCX and CHILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer