FHKCX vs. CHILX
FHKCX (Fidelity China Region Fund) and CHILX (BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FHKCX returned 9.09%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for CHILX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FHKCX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CHILX.
Performance
FHKCX vs. CHILX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHKCX achieves a 39.90% return, which is significantly higher than CHILX's 13.72% return.
FHKCX
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 39.90%
- 6M
- 43.06%
- 1Y
- 86.69%
- 3Y*
- 34.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
CHILX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 41.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- —
FHKCX vs. CHILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 39.90% | 42.56% | 23.15% | -0.29% | -23.87% | -13.69% | 47.85% | 40.85% |
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 13.72% | 26.30% | 15.44% | -12.29% | -28.54% | 3.54% | 48.69% | 48.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHKCX and CHILX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between FHKCX and CHILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHKCX vs. CHILX — Risk / Return Rank
FHKCX
CHILX
FHKCX vs. CHILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHKCX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.14 | 2.61 | +1.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.85 | 3.47 | +1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.45 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.15 | 5.04 | +3.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.25 | 16.20 | +9.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHKCX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14 | 2.61 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.04 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.57 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
FHKCX vs. CHILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHKCX drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than CHILX's maximum drawdown of -47.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKCX and CHILX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHKCX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.96% | -47.73% | -14.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.80% | -8.54% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.02% | -22.59% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.42% | -43.88% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.86% | +4.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.26% | -20.47% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 2.65% | +0.83% |
Volatility
FHKCX vs. CHILX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) at 6.06%. This indicates that FHKCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHKCX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 6.06% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.63% | 11.88% | +4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.26% | 16.51% | +4.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.24% | 20.28% | +3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 21.84% | +0.49% |
FHKCX vs. CHILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHKCX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than CHILX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHKCX vs. CHILX - Dividend Comparison
FHKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than CHILX's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 2.58% | 2.94% | 2.11% | 2.02% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 3.64% | 12.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 1.25% | 1.75% | 1.39% | 1.92% | 1.05% | 10.77% | 4.85% | 0.66% | 0.83% | 0.39% | 1.35% | 15.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FHKCX and CHILX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHKCX has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to CHILX (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHKCX dropped -61.96% vs CHILX's -47.73%.
FHKCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.14 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHKCX and CHILX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer