FHKCX vs. FTABX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FHKCX (Fidelity China Region Fund) and FTABX (Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - FHKCX is a China Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FTABX is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FHKCX returned 15.70%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for FTABX. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. FHKCX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FTABX.

Performance

FHKCX vs. FTABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) and Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKCX achieves a 39.37% return, which is significantly higher than FTABX's 1.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FHKCX has outperformed FTABX with an annualized return of 15.70%, while FTABX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.24% annualized return.

FHKCX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 39.37%
• 6M: 40.46%
• 1Y: 79.75%
• 3Y*: 34.29%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: 15.70%

FTABX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.56%
• YTD: 1.61%
• 6M: 2.08%
• 1Y: 7.06%
• 3Y*: 4.30%
• 5Y*: 1.03%
• 10Y*: 2.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHKCX vs. FTABX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	39.37%	42.56%	23.15%	-0.29%	-23.87%	-13.69%	47.85%	35.12%	-17.43%	51.94%
FTABX Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund	1.61%	5.60%	1.54%	7.51%	-10.74%	2.20%	4.80%	8.58%	0.67%	6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between FHKCX and FTABX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2001	-0.09

The correlation between FHKCX and FTABX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FHKCX vs. FTABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHKCX

FHKCX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FHKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FHKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FHKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FHKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FHKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FTABX

FTABX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FTABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FTABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FTABX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FTABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FTABX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHKCX vs. FTABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) and Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHKCX	FTABX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.56	2.66	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.15	4.18	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.66	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.52	2.35	+5.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.43	7.97	+14.46

FHKCX vs. FTABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is higher than the FTABX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKCX and FTABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHKCX vs. FTABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKCX drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than FTABX's maximum drawdown of -16.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKCX and FTABX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHKCX	FTABX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.96%	-16.14%	-45.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.80%	-3.11%	-7.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.02%	-5.99%	-16.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.42%	-16.14%	-36.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.41%	-16.14%	-42.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-0.60%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.23%	-2.12%	-18.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	0.91%	+2.70%

Volatility

FHKCX vs. FTABX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) has a higher volatility of 10.30% compared to Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) at 0.76%. This indicates that FHKCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHKCX	FTABX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.30%	0.76%	+9.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.67%	2.13%	+16.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.87%	2.74%	+20.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.53%	4.16%	+20.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.48%	4.29%	+18.19%

FHKCX vs. FTABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKCX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FTABX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHKCX vs. FTABX - Dividend Comparison

FHKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than FTABX's 3.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	1.26%	1.75%	1.39%	1.92%	1.05%	10.77%	4.85%	0.66%	0.83%	0.39%	1.35%	15.47%
FTABX Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund	3.21%	4.18%	2.81%	2.90%	2.16%	2.27%	2.64%	2.94%	3.01%	3.49%	4.22%	3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHKCX and FTABX in my portfolio?

FHKCX and FTABX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHKCX or FTABX?

FHKCX has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to FTABX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHKCX dropped -61.96% vs FTABX's -16.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.