FHKAX vs. TDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF).
FHKAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. TDF is managed by Franklin Templeton Investments.
Performance
FHKAX vs. TDF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHKAX vs. TDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 5.42% | 42.19% | 22.84% | -0.60% | -24.09% | -13.95% | 47.37% | 34.71% | -17.67% | 51.46% |
TDF Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. | -4.88% | 37.70% | 5.44% | -20.06% | -32.93% | -18.02% | 52.98% | 27.97% | -11.80% | 42.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHKAX achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly higher than TDF's -4.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FHKAX has outperformed TDF with an annualized return of 11.83%, while TDF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.59% annualized return.
FHKAX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 43.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
TDF
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -4.88%
- 6M
- -7.24%
- 1Y
- 13.51%
- 3Y*
- 2.14%
- 5Y*
- -9.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHKAX vs. TDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
FHKAX vs. TDF — Risk / Return Rank
FHKAX
TDF
FHKAX vs. TDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHKAX | TDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 0.63 | +1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 0.95 | +1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.14 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 0.78 | +1.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.62 | 2.60 | +7.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHKAX | TDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 0.63 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | -0.36 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.19 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.29 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHKAX and TDF is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHKAX vs. TDF - Dividend Comparison
FHKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than TDF's 3.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 1.51% | 1.59% | 1.22% | 1.58% | 0.59% | 10.80% | 4.71% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.21% | 0.99% | 15.33% |
TDF Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. | 3.77% | 3.55% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 12.73% | 14.13% | 24.72% | 10.75% | 12.43% | 7.95% | 10.34% | 22.49% |
Drawdowns
FHKAX vs. TDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHKAX drawdown since its inception was -58.62%, smaller than the maximum TDF drawdown of -68.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKAX and TDF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHKAX | TDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.62% | -68.15% | +9.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.97% | -16.05% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.04% | -62.07% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.62% | -66.87% | +8.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.83% | -48.36% | +37.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.15% | -22.44% | +3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 4.80% | -0.68% |
Volatility
FHKAX vs. TDF - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF) at 6.03%. This indicates that FHKAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHKAX | TDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.26% | 6.03% | +3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.44% | 12.48% | +3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.16% | 21.72% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 27.18% | -3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 23.88% | -1.79% |