FHKAX vs. FXI
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI).
FHKAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. FXI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 25 Index. It was launched on Oct 5, 2004.
Performance
FHKAX vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHKAX vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 8.27% | 42.19% | 22.84% | -0.60% | -24.09% | -13.95% | 47.37% | 34.71% | -17.67% | 51.46% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.13% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHKAX achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's -7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FHKAX has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 12.13%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower 3.03% annualized return.
FHKAX
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 45.99%
- 3Y*
- 20.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
FXI
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- YTD
- -7.13%
- 6M
- -13.13%
- 1Y
- 1.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- -3.44%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHKAX vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHKAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHKAX vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
FHKAX
FXI
FHKAX vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHKAX | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 0.08 | +1.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 0.28 | +2.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.04 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 0.10 | +2.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 0.29 | +10.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHKAX | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 0.08 | +1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | -0.11 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.11 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.17 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHKAX and FXI is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHKAX vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
FHKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than FXI's 2.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 1.47% | 1.59% | 1.22% | 1.58% | 0.59% | 10.80% | 4.71% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.21% | 0.99% | 15.33% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.60% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Drawdowns
FHKAX vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHKAX drawdown since its inception was -58.62%, smaller than the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKAX and FXI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHKAX | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.62% | -72.68% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.91% | -16.74% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.04% | -55.14% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.62% | -60.81% | +2.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.41% | -26.87% | +18.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.15% | -31.27% | +12.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 5.89% | -1.73% |
Volatility
FHKAX vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 6.74%. This indicates that FHKAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHKAX | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 6.74% | +3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.54% | 14.71% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.25% | 24.29% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 31.64% | -7.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 27.70% | -5.60% |