FHKAX vs. FTIHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX).
FHKAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. FTIHX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016.
Performance
FHKAX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHKAX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 5.42% | 42.19% | 22.84% | -0.60% | -24.09% | -13.95% | 47.37% | 34.71% | -17.67% | 51.46% |
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund | -1.15% | 32.59% | 4.98% | 15.49% | -16.29% | 8.45% | 11.09% | 21.50% | -14.40% | 25.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHKAX achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly higher than FTIHX's -1.15% return.
FHKAX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 43.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
FTIHX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -11.11%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- 1Y
- 24.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHKAX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHKAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHKAX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank
FHKAX
FTIHX
FHKAX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHKAX | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 1.47 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 1.97 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 1.92 | +0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.62 | 7.63 | +1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHKAX | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.47 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.45 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.54 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHKAX and FTIHX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHKAX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison
FHKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than FTIHX's 2.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 1.51% | 1.59% | 1.22% | 1.58% | 0.59% | 10.80% | 4.71% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.21% | 0.99% | 15.33% |
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund | 2.82% | 2.78% | 2.88% | 2.78% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 1.62% | 2.61% | 2.21% | 0.45% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FHKAX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHKAX drawdown since its inception was -58.62%, which is greater than FTIHX's maximum drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKAX and FTIHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHKAX | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.62% | -35.75% | -22.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.97% | -11.25% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.04% | -29.99% | -24.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.83% | -11.25% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.15% | -7.31% | -11.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 2.84% | +1.28% |
Volatility
FHKAX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) at 7.05%. This indicates that FHKAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHKAX | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.26% | 7.05% | +2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.44% | 10.67% | +5.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.16% | 15.82% | +7.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 15.03% | +8.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 16.00% | +6.09% |