FHKAX vs. FCHKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX).
FHKAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. FCHKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.
Performance
FHKAX vs. FCHKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHKAX vs. FCHKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 5.42% | 42.19% | 22.84% | -0.60% | -24.09% | -13.95% | 47.37% | 34.71% | -17.67% | 51.46% |
FCHKX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C | 5.23% | 41.13% | 21.90% | -1.27% | -24.66% | -14.60% | 46.29% | 33.74% | -18.29% | 50.37% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FHKAX having a 5.42% return and FCHKX slightly lower at 5.23%. Over the past 10 years, FHKAX has outperformed FCHKX with an annualized return of 11.83%, while FCHKX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.00% annualized return.
FHKAX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 43.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
FCHKX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -9.11%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 42.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHKAX vs. FCHKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHKAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than FCHKX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHKAX vs. FCHKX — Risk / Return Rank
FHKAX
FCHKX
FHKAX vs. FCHKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHKAX | FCHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 1.81 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 2.34 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.42 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.62 | 9.31 | +0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHKAX | FCHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.81 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.07 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.50 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.18 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHKAX and FCHKX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHKAX vs. FCHKX - Dividend Comparison
FHKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than FCHKX's 0.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 1.51% | 1.59% | 1.22% | 1.58% | 0.59% | 10.80% | 4.71% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.21% | 0.99% | 15.33% |
FCHKX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C | 0.83% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 11.31% | 4.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FHKAX vs. FCHKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHKAX drawdown since its inception was -58.62%, roughly equal to the maximum FCHKX drawdown of -59.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKAX and FCHKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHKAX | FCHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.62% | -59.14% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.97% | -15.97% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.04% | -54.57% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.62% | -59.14% | +0.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.83% | -10.88% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.15% | -21.52% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 4.15% | -0.03% |
Volatility
FHKAX vs. FCHKX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) have volatilities of 9.26% and 9.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHKAX | FCHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.26% | 9.28% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.44% | 16.44% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.16% | 23.15% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 23.96% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 22.09% | 0.00% |