PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHI vs. LEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FHI vs. LEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) and Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHI achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly higher than LEU's -23.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FHI has underperformed LEU with an annualized return of 10.84%, while LEU has yielded a comparatively higher 48.59% annualized return.


FHI

1D
1.84%
1M
4.11%
YTD
10.82%
6M
13.66%
1Y
38.38%
3Y*
21.48%
5Y*
16.10%
10Y*
10.84%

LEU

1D
2.76%
1M
-9.39%
YTD
-23.10%
6M
-33.00%
1Y
32.40%
3Y*
81.72%
5Y*
51.72%
10Y*
48.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHI vs. LEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.
10.82%30.45%29.60%-3.72%-0.16%34.68%-3.79%27.07%-23.34%32.26%
LEU
Centrus Energy Corp.
-23.10%264.45%22.42%67.52%-34.92%115.78%236.19%307.10%-57.86%-37.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FHI and LEU is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 1998

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FHI:

$4.14B

LEU:

$4.19B

EPS

FHI:

$5.35

LEU:

$2.89

PE Ratio

FHI:

10.64

LEU:

64.52

PS Ratio

FHI:

2.28

LEU:

8.64

PB Ratio

FHI:

2.66

LEU:

5.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

FHI:

$1.86B

LEU:

$452.30M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FHI:

$958.45M

LEU:

$116.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

FHI:

$564.21M

LEU:

$70.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHI vs. LEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHI
FHI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHI Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

LEU
LEU Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHI vs. LEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) and Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHILEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.13

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

0.53

+2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

0.87

+8.66

FHI vs. LEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the LEU Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHI and LEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHILEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

0.36

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.60

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.59

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

-0.09

+0.37

Drawdowns

FHI vs. LEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHI drawdown since its inception was -64.89%, smaller than the maximum LEU drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHI and LEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHILEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.89%

-99.98%

+35.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-61.35%

+48.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.17%

-61.35%

+41.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.61%

-78.23%

+48.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.89%

-83.84%

+18.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-97.24%

+95.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.75%

-73.97%

+58.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

37.33%

-33.29%

Volatility

FHI vs. LEU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) is 7.36%, while Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) has a volatility of 24.16%. This indicates that FHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHILEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

24.16%

-16.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.66%

64.30%

-46.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.43%

90.35%

-67.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.88%

86.11%

-61.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.43%

82.25%

-49.82%

Dividends

FHI vs. LEU - Dividend Comparison

FHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, while LEU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.
2.46%2.55%5.38%3.38%2.97%2.87%7.20%3.31%3.99%2.77%7.07%3.49%
LEU
Centrus Energy Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FHI vs. LEU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federated Hermes, Inc. and Centrus Energy Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
478.96M
76.70M
(FHI) Total Revenue
(LEU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FHI vs. LEU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Federated Hermes, Inc. and Centrus Energy Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
41.1%
Portfolio components
FHI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federated Hermes, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 478.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LEU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a gross profit of 31.50M and revenue of 76.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.

FHI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federated Hermes, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.33M and revenue of 478.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.4%.

LEU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported an operating income of 800.00K and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.

FHI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federated Hermes, Inc. reported a net income of 95.95M and revenue of 478.96M, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.

LEU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a net income of 10.00M and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FHI and LEU have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEU has higher volatility (24.16%) compared to FHI (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHI dropped -64.89% vs LEU's -99.98%.

FHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHI and LEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer