PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHI vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FHI vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FHI vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.
12.21%30.45%29.60%-3.72%-0.16%34.68%-3.79%27.07%-23.34%32.26%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHI achieves a 12.21% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FHI having a 12.12% annualized return and ^GSPC not far ahead at 12.24%.


FHI

1D
2.36%
1M
1.90%
YTD
12.21%
6M
15.76%
1Y
45.91%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
12.12%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHI vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHI
FHI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHI vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHI^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

0.92

+1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.60

1.41

+1.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

1.41

+2.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.69

6.61

+4.07

FHI vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHI Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHI and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHI^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

0.92

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.61

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.68

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.46

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between FHI and ^GSPC is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

FHI vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHI drawdown since its inception was -64.89%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHI and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FHI^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.89%

-56.78%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

-12.14%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.61%

-25.43%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.89%

-33.92%

-30.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.78%

+5.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-10.75%

-5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

2.60%

+1.75%

Volatility

FHI vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that FHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FHI^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

5.37%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.73%

9.55%

+6.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.93%

18.33%

+4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.94%

16.90%

+8.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.34%

18.05%

+14.29%