FHI vs. VTV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV).

VTV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Prime Market Value Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.

Performance

FHI vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FHI vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHI Federated Hermes, Inc.	12.21%	30.45%	29.60%	-3.72%	-0.16%	34.68%	-3.79%	27.07%	-23.34%	32.26%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	3.54%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	26.53%	2.33%	25.66%	-5.47%	17.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHI achieves a 12.21% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 3.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FHI having a 12.12% annualized return and VTV not far behind at 11.83%.

FHI

• 1D: 2.36%
• 1M: 1.90%
• YTD: 12.21%
• 6M: 15.76%
• 1Y: 45.91%
• 3Y*: 17.96%
• 5Y*: 17.70%
• 10Y*: 12.12%

VTV

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -4.38%
• YTD: 3.54%
• 6M: 6.37%
• 1Y: 16.56%
• 3Y*: 15.18%
• 5Y*: 10.91%
• 10Y*: 11.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FHI vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHI

FHI Risk / Return Rank: 88
FHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FHI Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FHI Martin Ratio Rank: 90

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 60
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 63
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHI vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHI	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.12	+0.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	1.61	+0.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.24	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	1.44	+2.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.69	6.48	+4.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHI vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHI Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHI and VTV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHI	VTV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	1.12	+0.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.79	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.71	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.49	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between FHI and VTV is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FHI vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

FHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than VTV's 2.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHI Federated Hermes, Inc.	2.34%	2.55%	5.38%	3.38%	2.97%	2.87%	7.20%	3.31%	3.99%	2.77%	7.07%	3.49%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	2.02%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Drawdowns

FHI vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHI drawdown since its inception was -64.89%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHI and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHI	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.89%	-59.27%	-5.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	-11.32%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.61%	-17.04%	-12.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.89%	-36.78%	-28.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.58%	+4.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.82%	-7.92%	-7.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.35%	2.51%	+1.84%

Volatility

FHI vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.65%. This indicates that FHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHI	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.11%	3.65%	+2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.73%	7.71%	+8.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.93%	14.89%	+8.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.94%	13.88%	+11.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.34%	16.67%	+15.67%