FHFAX vs. LTSTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class A (FHFAX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX).
FHFAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 1, 2011. LTSTX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Feb 28, 2008.
Performance
FHFAX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHFAX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHFAX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class A | -4.07% | 22.74% | 13.42% | 18.88% | -18.20% | 15.74% | 17.26% | 26.38% | -8.52% | 21.37% |
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund | -2.64% | 12.16% | 11.91% | 13.30% | -15.23% | 10.91% | 13.70% | 20.50% | -6.41% | 16.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHFAX achieves a -4.07% return, which is significantly lower than LTSTX's -2.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FHFAX has outperformed LTSTX with an annualized return of 10.36%, while LTSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.44% annualized return.
FHFAX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -9.37%
- YTD
- -4.07%
- 6M
- -0.97%
- 1Y
- 17.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.36%
LTSTX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHFAX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHFAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHFAX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank
FHFAX
LTSTX
FHFAX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class A (FHFAX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHFAX | LTSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 1.02 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 1.47 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 1.21 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 5.61 | +0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHFAX | LTSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.02 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.54 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.76 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.45 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHFAX and LTSTX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHFAX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison
FHFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, less than LTSTX's 12.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHFAX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class A | 5.41% | 5.19% | 1.28% | 1.57% | 10.67% | 9.08% | 4.81% | 6.33% | 9.98% | 3.29% | 4.16% | 4.12% |
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund | 12.52% | 12.19% | 9.74% | 4.26% | 8.00% | 7.66% | 5.25% | 6.91% | 6.39% | 4.75% | 3.65% | 8.91% |
Drawdowns
FHFAX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHFAX drawdown since its inception was -31.27%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHFAX and LTSTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHFAX | LTSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.27% | -48.17% | +16.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -6.47% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.45% | -21.01% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.27% | -23.33% | -7.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.91% | -5.15% | -4.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -6.21% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 1.40% | +1.13% |
Volatility
FHFAX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class A (FHFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) at 2.99%. This indicates that FHFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHFAX | LTSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 2.99% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 4.90% | +4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 8.43% | +7.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.77% | 9.16% | +5.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 9.81% | +5.58% |