PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHEQ vs. HTUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHEQ vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHEQ achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than HTUS's 10.86% return.


FHEQ

1D
0.69%
1M
1.24%
6M
7.59%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
16.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.55%

HTUS

1D
1.19%
1M
0.34%
6M
9.93%
YTD
10.86%
1Y
22.65%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
14.61%
10Y*
12.41%
ALL TIME*
11.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.34M$2.52M$2.78M
$530.02K$526.22K$608.25K

FHEQ vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FHEQ
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
8.57%13.34%11.10%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
10.86%16.57%14.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FHEQ and HTUS is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024

0.89

The correlation between FHEQ and HTUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHEQ vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHEQ
FHEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FHEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FHEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHEQ vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHEQHTUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.43

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.45

11.54

-4.09

FHEQ vs. HTUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the HTUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHEQ and HTUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHEQ vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHEQ drawdown since its inception was -11.12%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHEQ and HTUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHEQHTUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.12%

-47.50%

+36.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.77%

-8.68%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.97%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-4.02%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.83%

+0.25%

Volatility

FHEQ vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) is 2.80%, while Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that FHEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHEQHTUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

3.04%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

10.24%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.21%

12.28%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.51%

19.09%

-8.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.51%

21.50%

-10.99%

FHEQ vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHEQ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHEQ vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison

FHEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than HTUS's 10.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FHEQ
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
0.54%0.63%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
10.73%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHEQ and HTUS have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTUS has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to FHEQ (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHEQ dropped -11.12% vs HTUS's -47.50%.

On 1-year performance, HTUS leads with 22.65% vs 16.95% for FHEQ. On fees, FHEQ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, FHEQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 22.65% return vs 16.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FHEQ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for HTUS.

HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.73%, compared with 0.54% for FHEQ.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for FHEQ and 0.96% for HTUS.

HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHEQ and HTUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer