PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHCIX vs. IXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHCIX vs. IXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I (FHCIX) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FHCIX having a -5.08% return and IXJ slightly lower at -5.26%. Over the past 10 years, FHCIX has outperformed IXJ with an annualized return of 8.41%, while IXJ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.66% annualized return.


FHCIX

1D
-1.81%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
-5.08%
6M
-6.17%
1Y
14.48%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
8.41%

IXJ

1D
0.39%
1M
0.34%
YTD
-5.26%
6M
-4.88%
1Y
9.30%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
7.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHCIX vs. IXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHCIX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I
-5.08%14.48%4.22%4.07%-12.84%11.53%21.40%28.22%7.51%24.38%
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
-5.26%14.99%0.55%3.62%-4.94%19.60%12.74%23.23%2.83%20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FHCIX and IXJ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2001

0.83

The correlation between FHCIX and IXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHCIX vs. IXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHCIX
FHCIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FHCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IXJ
IXJ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHCIX vs. IXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I (FHCIX) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHCIXIXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.12

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

0.87

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.04

2.11

+0.93

FHCIX vs. IXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHCIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the IXJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHCIX and IXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHCIXIXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.64

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.28

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.49

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.42

+0.16

Drawdowns

FHCIX vs. IXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHCIX drawdown since its inception was -44.75%, which is greater than IXJ's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCIX and IXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHCIXIXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.75%

-40.60%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.37%

-10.78%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.38%

-18.14%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-18.14%

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.24%

-27.35%

-1.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.05%

-9.27%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-6.92%

-2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

4.41%

+0.49%

Volatility

FHCIX vs. IXJ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I (FHCIX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) at 3.75%. This indicates that FHCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHCIXIXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

3.75%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

10.05%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

14.55%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.90%

14.21%

+3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

15.67%

+3.11%

FHCIX vs. IXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHCIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than IXJ's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHCIX vs. IXJ - Dividend Comparison

FHCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.18%, more than IXJ's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHCIX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I
12.18%11.56%10.92%0.00%0.00%5.64%5.72%0.48%4.65%0.06%0.00%6.29%
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
1.47%1.40%1.50%1.38%1.17%1.12%1.27%1.42%2.11%1.46%1.73%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHCIX and IXJ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHCIX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to IXJ (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHCIX dropped -44.75% vs IXJ's -40.60%.

FHCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHCIX and IXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer